StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

British Defence Policy - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "British Defence Policy" tells us about Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Three years later, the entire world got a very clear picture of what calamities terrorists could bring about, when the al-Qaeda network destroyed most of the World Trade Center in New York City…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
British Defence Policy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "British Defence Policy"

In 1998, the British government conducted a Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Three years later, the entire world got a very clear picture of what calamities terrorists could bring about, when the al-Qaeda network destroyed most of the World Trade Center in New York City. Because the United States had previously been such a welcoming country for incoming students, terrorists were able to get trained as pilots at American institutes. Because United States airport security had previously been somewhat more trusting, those same terrorists were able to use box cutters to intimidate passengers and airline employees, gaining entry into the cockpits of three passenger planes. The passengers on the fourth plane rose up and fought their oppressors, but the price was fatal. By the time that military responses could be coordinated, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon had already been hit. Paradigm shifts like this were part of the rationale behind the writing of the Defence White Paper entitled "Delivering Security in a Changing World" in 2003. The British government recognized a number of factors that necessitated changes in the ways that government agencies handled domestic security. According to the introduction to the white paper, it was "evident that the successful management of international security problems [would] require ever more integrated planning of military, diplomatic and economic instruments at both national and international levels" (Ministry of Defence 2003, p. 1). In other words, not only would countries have to be able to cooperate in ways that had not yet been possible in meeting the challenges of a common enemy, agencies within the same government would also have to work in concert swiftly to meet the challenges of terrorism, and there are many countries in which this interagency cooperation would prove more of a challenge than finding common ground with other countries. The improvement in military technologies was also a factor, which led those writing the paper to "look at how.new technologies [can] deliver military effects in different ways[including] flexible forces able to configure to generate the right capability in a less predictable and more complex operational environment" (Ministry of Defence 2003, p. 1). The goal of the white paper was to "move away from simplistic platform-centric planning to a fully 'networked enabled capability' able to exploit effects-based planning and operations, using forces which are truly adaptable, capable of even greater levels of precision, and rapidly deployable" (Ministry of Defence 2003, p. 1). Clearly, some paradigm shifts were underway in the restructuring of British security. Although the British government conducted another SDR in 2002, after the 9/11 attacks in the United States, there were other international events and factors that led to the writing of this white paper. The first one mentioned was the large number of small crises that were occurring all over the globe, including Kosovo, Macedonia, Sierra Leone, East Timor, Afghanistan, Congo, and Iraq - all at once. Constructing a military to face two or three theaters, at most, would be outdated in the current security environment. Also, while theaters in past conflicts, such as the Falkland Islands, or even such conflicts that, at the time, seemed protracted (like the Second World War), ended up taking less time to resolve that some of these foreign crises have in the past decade. Also, the structure of NATO has changed, transitioning from a group of large, static forces to smaller response teams that can go outside the NATO territory. Similarly, the creation of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) has fragmented the size of response teams even further. Also, a strategic partnership with Russia could present a variety of demands, given the instability that, at times, has plagued Russia's infrastructure, particularly their oil pipelines. The spreading of weapons of mass destruction around the world, and particularly the ease with which individuals and small groups, as opposed to nations, can create and develop these weaponry systems, are of specific concern to the British government. A positive factor that also served to highlight the need for this white paper was the emerging concepts and technologies surrounding such ideas Network Enhanced Capability (NEC) as well as precision weapons (Ministry of Defence 2003, pgs. 2-3). There were a number of specific changes that resulted from the adoption of this white paper. In general, the British goal was to be able to handle three operations that were small to medium, at least one of which was a long-term peacekeeping excursion, along the lines of Kosovo. All three of these forces were expected to be able to act as the lead nation in coalition operations. Also, the British military sought to be able to deploy for a large-scale operation while running a small-scale operation simultaneously. As far as force-specific changes, those occurred as follows: There were a significant number of reductions in forces and assets. The British Army lost 1,000 soldiers, the Royal Air Force lost 7,000 flyers, and the Royal Navy lost 1,500 sailors. Four battalions were removed from Northern Ireland and distributed to other areas of need. Several artillery batteries were lightened and moved. Smaller infantry battalions were combined into larger regiments. The Lightweight Mobile Artillery Weapon System was purchased for three regiments. Three light-armoured squadrons were created for training on the Future Rapid Effect System (FRES), which is the next generation of armored vehicles. In the Royal Air Force, such older craft as the Nimrod MR-class and Tornado F3 were to be gradually replaced with such newer, more versatile equipment as the Typhoon and the Boeing C-17. The Rapier missile launchers were either blended in with the Army Royal Artillery, instead of keeping its old place in the Royal Air Force, or downsized. In the Royal Navy, such ships as the Type 45 destroyers, Type 23 frigates, nuclear attack subs and countermeasure vessels were downsized, because of the shrinking need for naval capacity in these kinds of conflicts. Most of the work for NATO and other security organizations is land-based only. The military budget was set to increase from almost 30 billion pounds in 2004/2005 to 33.4 billion pounds in 2007/2008, including 3 billion to be spent purchasing newer, more wieldy helicopters by 2015 ("Delivering Security" 2007). Other significant changes dealt more with larger-level restructuring. One of the army's armoured regiments was converted to handling formation reconnaissance. In other words, information became more valuable than tanks. Also, all single-battalion infantry regiments were merged into larger regiments that were either new or already existed. One battalion of the Parachute Regiment was converted into a specialist special forces support battalion. Total infantry battalions in the army were reduced from 40 to 36. New regiments were created of commando engineers and signals personnel ("Delivering Security 2007). As one might imagine, in the politicized era that has characterized post-9/11 international security, particularly the increasingly unilateral forces that remain in Iraq, the changes in the white paper sparked some strong opinions. An editorial in The Guardian pointed out that, while these changes in the British military would make it more capable of responding to a larger number of smaller crises around the globe, it was worth questioning whether or not positioning itself for more overseas battles was the proper goal of military restructuring. While it might be well and good to help put out fires around the globe in the interest of reducing worldwide terrorism, and, hopefully, minimizing the risk of that terrorism entering the United Kingdom, the editorial also asks whether or not the changes in British military policy are sufficiently addressing the needs of what the United States calls "homeland security." While such American legislation as the Patriot Act has changed many aspects of domestic life in the United States, for the purported purpose of keeping terrorism out and maintaining public order and security, there was no such legislation concomitant with the changes in the British military structure. More specifically, the editorial argues that "[w]here the white paper goes wrong is in proposing to further develop 'expeditionary force' capabilities inter-operable with US forces, thus increasing the potential for more all-out wars of conquest like Iraq under US/NATO command" ("We Cannot Have it All," 2003). One could very easily argue that adding to the number of such conflicts that the British Army is involved with could easily add to the risk that terrorists would retaliate by taking out targets in the United Kingdom, thereby giving the restructuring the troublesome effect of worsening internal security. As Mary McGrory wrote, "Blair [has been] essential to Bush's dream of a war. His staunchness has lent plausibility and respectability to the venture" ("US papers back Blair," 2003). So, while the changes may well have streamlined many parts of the British military, and made it able to respond more efficiently to the new challenges of the twentieth-century geopolitical climate, another result has been to make the British government appear complicit with the deeds of the American government. What many people viewed as a proper response to the ravages of September 11, 2001, in the United States, at least at the time, may have drained much of British credibility in the sands of the Middle East. It is too soon to say whether Prime Minister Blair's recent withdrawal of troops from Iraq will save him from the same condemnations that rain down on the head of President Bush. Works Cited British Ministry of Defence (2003). Delivering Security in a Changing World: Defence White Paper 2003. Accessed 11 March 2007 online at http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/UnitedKingdom-2003.pdf "Delivering Security in a Changing World" (2007). Accessed 11 March 2007 online at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delivering_Security_in_a_Changing_World "US papers back Blair." BBC News Online. Accessed 11 March 2007 online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2848161.stm "We cannot have it all" (2003). Accessed 11 March 2007 online at http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,1105095,00.html Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“British Defence Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1518863-british-defence-policy
(British Defence Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/politics/1518863-british-defence-policy.
“British Defence Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1518863-british-defence-policy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF British Defence Policy

Role NATO in the World

It has evolved into a community of values and destiny, and a forum of political consultation on vital issues of foreign policy and security.... NATO governments, legislatures, and policy elites were challenged, not without difficulty, with adapting NATO to the emerging security environment and rediscovering the original, broad purpose of the Atlantic Community to encourage habits of cooperative security among nations--"a just and lasting peaceful order in Europe accompanied by security guarantees....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Secretary of State for Defence

The Secretary of State for Defence is the Cabinet Minister with the responsibility of making and executing defence policy, as well as furnishing the means by which it is performed.... But the following are particularly his responsibilities: operations; personnel; policy (together with nuclear questions and European defence, oversight of main acquisition questions as well as defence industrial problems; media and communications; finance and effectiveness)1 (Lachman, Camm, & Resetar, 2001, p....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Australian International History

hellip; Australia had been dependent on Great Britain in the period before these changes, however, the policies of the Australian government too soon changed o adapt to the changing world around it. Although in the last two decades of the nineteenth century which saw the rise of Australian nationalism as an ideology, it had seemed that the social and political atmosphere in Australia would lead to a point where Britain would cease to have a presence in the pacific and Australia would cease to recognize itself as a part of the imperial empire, but, by the dawn of the twentieth century it was apparent that as long as Britain possessed the military strength to protect it's European and pacific interes ts, Australia would still be under the umbrella of the empire and not completely control it's own foreign policy....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

UK Aviation Policy

Then on June 17, 1980, british defence Secretary, Francis Pym, announced in the House of Commons that 160 missiles were to be stationed at the United States Air Force standby base at RAF Greenham Common in Berkshire, and RAF Molesworth.... The writer of this essay "UK Aviation policy" aims to investigate the concern of the United Kingdom government aviation industry policy and how it relates to its economy and prosperity.... Additionally, the paper will discuss how the citizens are able to impact or even improve the aviation policy....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Import and Export Markets in the United Kingdom

This essay explores the import and export markets in the United Kingdom.... The UK exports most of its goods to Brazil, India, Russia, and China while most of the imports come from China.... Over the past five years, some of the imports and exports have increased while others have decreased.... hellip; The researcher states that export and import market in the UK has recorded several depreciations and appreciations over the past five years....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Partys 1945 Election

Since 1918 the british society has gone through many social and political changes.... The 1945 general election gave Clement Attlee and the Labour Party a crushing majority, a landslide majority of 146 seats (Woodward, ____) The Clement administration was of mass radicalism ideology that stemmed from the World War II....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Law Relating to Official Secrecy

A prominent UK counselor once remarked that the task of balancing the public right to receive information, and the interest of the government to withhold it, is not easy.... The material often relate to matters of national security.... Whistleblowers are often hailed as national… However, such information may fall into the wrong hands and hence jeopardize the wellbeing of the entire nation....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Cross-Party Consensus on the Defence Policy Breakdown

The paper "Cross-Party Consensus on the Defence Policy Breakdown" operates mainly based on questions which can be stated as follows: To what extent and with what result did the cross-party consensus on the British Defence Policy breakdown of the 1980s?... hellip; This paper will investigate through a literature review the different rationale of the 1980s British cross-party consensus on defense policy breakdown.... nbsp; In our history, Great Britain's foreign policy is a “three overlapping circles”....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us