StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Supreme Court of the United States - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Supreme Court of the United States" highlights that abandoned property is defined as any property which has been deserted by the owner. The owner does not have any expectations regarding the privacy of the property. This is possible when a property is left unsecured in a public place…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
The Supreme Court of the United States
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Supreme Court of the United States"

Comprehensive Discussions The supreme court of the United s is the top most court of the federal court system. The Supreme Court comprises of a chief justice and nine judges who are known as justices. All these judges are presided over by the chief justice. The US Supreme Court is located at Washington D.C. those who are not satisfied with the US circuit courts and US district courts can appeal to the US Supreme Court. This process is mainly done through a legal process which is commonly known as “Petition for a writ of Certiorari”. The Supreme Court decides to accept such cases. Every year the US Supreme Court takes up 100 to 150 cases for argument. Four justices must give their consent for hearing the case. The US Supreme Court is primarily an appellate court having jurisdiction over ambassadors as well as two or more states (Understanding Federal and State Courts). The Supreme Court has a chief justice as well as associate justices whose numbers are fixed by the American congress. The present number of associate justices is presently eight. The president of the US has the power to nominate the justices and their appointments are sanctioned according to the advices and consent of the senate. Article III, §1, of the Constitution further provides that the Judges of both Supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and Shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. Article III, §1 of the constitution provides that the legal power of the United states shall be vested in only one supreme court as well as in such inferior courts as the congress may from time to time proclaim and institutes. Article. III, §2 states that the legal power shall be extended to all cases under the constitution to the US supreme court. It includes cases affecting ambassadors, public ministers, consuls, cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdictions, cases between two or more states, cases involving state and citizens of another state and of the same state, foreign states etc. In cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers, consuls, states, the US Supreme Court has the ultimate jurisdiction. In other cases the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction. The appellate jurisdiction has been given to the US Supreme Court by various statutes in the constitution. The basic statute which defines the judicial power is found in 28 U. S. C. §1251 et seq. The US congress from time to time gives powers to the US supreme court to prescribe rules of procedure that is to be followed by the lower courts as well (28 U. S. C. §2071 et seq). The working time of the Supreme Court is from Monday to Friday 9am to 4.30 pm. It is closed on Saturdays and Sundays as well as in other legal holidays. The clerk’s office is open from 9am to 5pm. The library can be accessed by the members of the bar, attorneys, and the congress. The normal functioning year of the US Supreme Court is from first Monday in October to the first Monday in October next year. Approximately 10000 cases are filed every year apart from 1200 applications of different types that are filed can be attended by a single justice (A Brief Overview of the Supreme Court). The supreme court of the United States is the court of the last resort. Cases can be appealed to the state supreme courts and federal appellate courts, no appeal can be made to the decisions of the US Supreme Court. In every year the US Supreme Court receive nearly thousands of requests to have the high court hear specific cases. These requests are known as writs of certiorari. The clerks under the justices scrutinize each and every request and submit a cert memo to the justices. The memos are reviewed by the justices and they hold a conference to decide which of these legal cases must go on the court’s docket. Deciding on the hearings of the cases accepted by the Supreme Court is vested under the discretion of the four justices; they are the ultimate voices to determine which cases should be heard. An order stating the acceptance to hear will be sent to the petitioner if the case is accepted by the justices to hear. Similarly cert is also granted to cases which have far reaching interests and issues by the justices. The Supreme Court may desire to hear a case and issue its judgment so that it can offer guidance to the lower level judges all through the state who have the same issues come through their court rooms on a daily basis.Cert is also granted when there is conflict between appellate courts in interpreting the rule of law. Here the Supreme Court issues correct interpretations (How does the US Supreme Court decide which cases it will hear? 2006). Under article III of the US constitution, the Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the US. Although the US Supreme Court is the final judicial authority in the US, it is not necessarily the last legal or political authority in the political system. There is no appeal systems for Supreme Court decisions but disputes can be proceeded to other government branches after the verdict by the Supreme Court. The congress and the state legislatures have absolute powers to alter or cancel out the rulings made by the Supreme Court that involves statutory interpretation by amending or clarifying statutes (U.S. Supreme Court). The supreme court of the United States is regarded often as the highest legal body that can define and interpret the law of the land. To view the court just as a legal establishment, however underestimates its significance. The Supreme Court has powers to decide cases on national policy. Therefore the court must be regarded as a political institution that solves disagreements in the society in accordance with the countries constitution. Although the Supreme Court decides on societal problems, it cannot be interpreted that it catalyzes a social change. Rather it follows the government opinion in such matters thereby following the national policies. The US Supreme Court has given landmark verdicts based on societal legal challenges. Prominent among them is the court case of Marbury vs Madison in the year 1803. This verdict established the power of judicial review that would enable the Supreme Court to be final interpreter of the national constitution. In this context it is worth to note that the US Supreme Court cannot use its power of judicial review unless or until it gets a case from the society. Challenges towards the social policy should come from individuals and not from the Supreme Court. In other case titled Gideon vs Wainright (1963), the ruling of the court was that the needy defendants who were charged with crime are eligible to avail the services of a lawyer which is paid for by the government as it is indicated in the sixth amendment (Berenji. 2008). In another famous case titled Nebraska press association vs Stuart, regarding rights of free press and fair trials, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the year 1975. This decision is regarded as one of the most closely followed verdicts in the history of the American constitution. Prior to this decision the media was prohibited from publishing certain matters of the crime and case publicly (Scherer). In another case named Yount vs Patton in 1984, the party was found guilty in the first trial. However appeal was made to the Supreme Court and he was not found guilty in the second occasion. In this occasion the Supreme Court opined that publicity might have been a problem during the first trial but the parties’ conviction during the second trial was found acceptable (Standler.2003). In Another case of Ross vs Oklahoma in 1988, the petitioner was charged with murder. The Oklahoma law provides both parties in capital trials with nine authoritative challenges to potential jurors. The trial court deprived of petitioners motion to remove for cause prospective juror Huling, who had said that he would vote to inflict death involuntarily if the jury found petitioner culpable. The defense exercised one of its authoritative challenges to remove him. Although the defense used all nine of its challenges, it did not challenge for cause any of the 12 jurors who actually heard the case. At the close of jury selection, the trial court overruled the objection of petitioner, who was a black colored person; all white jury denied him fair and impartial trial by his peers. The jury found petitioner guilty and sentenced him to death. The Oklahoma Court confirmed the decision (U.S. Supreme Court). In its land mark decision, in the case Batson vs Kentucky, the US Supreme Court introduced a test that would enable the prosecutors to prove racial discrimination in the field of jury selection. A lawyer should prove a supposition of discrimination when there is suspicion that a juror was removed on impermissible grounds (Johnson, Jay Shawn v. California). According to the fourth amendment of the US constitution, no search or seizure shall be carried out without a warrant. This is regarded as a wonderful right of the citizens. But in real this is always not possible. The Supreme Court over the years has provided several exceptions towards the requirement of warrants. The exceptions are in the area of searches with consent, frisk, plain feel or plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public places exceptions. There is no necessity for a warrant when the search is made on the consent given by the concerned party. Similarly the consent can be withdrawn any time. The consent to search the property should be given by the actual owner of the property or the owners who share the property. However, only common property can be searched. Privately held areas cannot be searched under this exception (Glenn. 2007). In the case between Minnesota vs Dickerson, the Supreme Court adopted a plain touch policy which stated that the police personnel can take up or seize evidence from person during pat down upon the condition that pat down is illegal. The item seized is illegal and the officer has legal access to it. However the court made exceptions in this verdict regarding warrant exception (Fourth Amendment). Abandoned property is defined as any property which has been deserted by the owner. The owner does not have any expectation regarding privacy of the property. This is possible when a property is left unsecured in a public place. The abandoned property is accessible to the police. This rule was upheld by the supreme court in the case between California vs Green wood (Belling. 2005). Reference: A Brief Overview of the Supreme Court. (online). Available:http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/briefoverview.pdf. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Belling. T. 2005. Search Warrant Exceptions. (online). Available:http://webpages.charter.net/caselaw4cops/articles/exceptions.htm#s9. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Berenji. S. The US Supreme Court : A "Follower, not a Leader" of Social Change. 2008. Vol 3 Num 1. (online). Available:http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol3n1/supreme.xml. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Fourth Amendment - the plain touch exception to the warrant requirement. (online). Available:http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-15710038.html. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Glenn. F. 2007. Exceptions to the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment.(online). Available:http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/359232/exceptions_to_the_warrant_requirement.html. Accessed on January 11, 2009. How does the US Supreme Court decide which cases it will hear? 2006..(online). Available:http://ask.metafilter.com/37272/how-does-the-US-supreme-court-decide-which-cases-it-will-hear. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Johnson, Jay Shawn v. California (06/13/2005).(online). Available:http://otd.oyez.org/cases/2004/johnson-jay-shawn-v-california-06132005. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Scherer.M.R. Rights in the Balance. (online). Available:http://www.ttup.ttu.edu/BookPages/9780896726260.html. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Standler.R.B. 2003. US court opinions on publicity and fair criminal trials.(online). Available:http://www.rbs2.com/pretrial2.pdf. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Understanding Federal and State Courts. (online). Available:http://www.uscourts.gov/outreach/resources/fedstate_lessonplan.htm. Accessed on January 11, 2009. U.S. Supreme Court. (online). Available:http://www.answers.com/topic/supreme-court-of-the-united-states. Accessed on January 11, 2009. U.S. Supreme Court. (online). Available:http://supreme.justia.com/us/487/81/case.html. Accessed on January 11, 2009. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Comprehensive Discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Comprehensive Discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1550994-comprehensive-discussions
(Comprehensive Discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Comprehensive Discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1550994-comprehensive-discussions.
“Comprehensive Discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1550994-comprehensive-discussions.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Supreme Court of the United States

Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)

supreme court of the united states.... Impact of the recent decision by the supreme court of the united s (SCOTUS), in the cases of Coleman v.... California was then directed to remedy the unusual and cruel punishments clause by a court order from a court of three-judge district.... California was then directed to remedy the unusual and cruel punishments clause by a court order from a court of three-judge district.... supreme court Upholds to Reduce Californian Prison Population....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The rights and responsibilities that the Constitution gives American citizens

? The “right to privacy” is not literally stated in the Constitution of the united states.... Name Professor Class Date the united states Constitution and the Supreme Court I.... It meant that every citizen is entitled to the same equal protection of laws in the united states regardless of race, creed or political orientation.... r the constitution Vote in federal elections Serve on a jury Bring family members to the united states Obtain citizenship for children born abroad Travel with a U....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

The Supreme Court of the United States - Business Decisions

This paper "The Supreme Court of the United States" focuses on the fact that the United States courts have interpreted the Sherman Antitrust Act to forbid only unreasonable restraints of trade.... the supreme court promulgated this flexible rule, called the Rule of Reason, in Standard Oil Co.... circuit courts authority "to prevent and restrain" any combination or conspiracy intended to restrain trade among the states.... The court considers the makeup of the relevant industry, the defendants' positions within that industry, the ability of the defendants' competitors to respond to the challenged practice....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Business Law - Case of New York Times v. Sullivan

After losing an appeal made in the Supreme Court of Alabama, New York Times took this case to The Supreme Court of the United States of America.... the united states Supreme Court gave a unanimous ruling favoring New York Times.... the supreme court stated that all the published statements happened to be protected by the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment Rights.... Sullivan happened to be a historical supreme court decision in the sphere of defamation and libel....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Taylor v. Louisiana

Taylor appealed the procedural issues to The Supreme Court of the United States.... omment:The case is an example of the role of The Supreme Court of the United States in ensuring a fair trial for all suspects.... Texas (1940), the supreme court ruled that for a jury system to fair and impartial, it must be made of a cross section of the community.... Thus, the supreme decision of the supreme court was based on a matter of law and adherence to the constitution....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

Actual Malice Rule

Sullivan, supra, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the existence of the common law of defamation guaranteed violation of free speech, which was under the constitution's first amendment.... "Actual Malice Rule" paper examines one of the rules in the united states' law that required to influence the establishment of libel that is up against public officials or public figures.... The definition only applies in the united states, and it has applied to several cases such as the New York Times Co....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Racial Discrimination and Hispanics in the United States

According to the Encyclopedia of The Supreme Court of the United States (2008), racial discrimination takes place 'when unequal or unfair treatment is provided to a person or group of people on the basis of their race' (Encyclopedia of The Supreme Court of the United States, 2008).... This paper "Racial Discrimination and Hispanics in the united states" tells that the concept of race and the method of grouping people into races are points of contention among those in the field of science, particularly with those who believe that race is not a valid taxonomic classification....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Is the US Supreme Court Too Powerful

"Is the US Supreme Court Too Powerful" paper examines different arguments that exist as to whether The Supreme Court of the United States is too powerful or not.... Moreover, these officials serve in the Court for a lifetime and the proposers of the claim feel that there is no job that guarantees a lifetime service and they, therefore, feel that The Supreme Court of the United States is too then it really should.... It is apparent that the united states Supreme Court is the highest court in the States....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us