StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Financial Tools of Ferro Plc - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This case study "Financial Tools of Ferro Plc" describes the managerial principles and financial tools used by Ferro Plc. The method used here for evaluation of the project is a Net present value that encompasses discounting of future cash flows to find their present values…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.8% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Financial Tools of Ferro Plc"

Finance For Manager Introduction Ferro Plc has to decide about entering into a new market segment as a specialist manufacturer of new product ‘Tensilite’. There are two options for expansion plans and various forecasts to decide about expansion of its production capacity. Various financial tools like CVP, WACC, Average rate of return, and Net present value using DCF have been used in this report to help Ferro Plc in such decision making. Further the evaluation of the project also takes into account the future inflationary and risk factors. The analytical report follows as under: Manufacturing capacity decisions are basically related to profitability. Ferro Plc should enlarge its manufacturing capacity only when it maximizes its profitability. Marginal costing project analysis tool, also known as cost volume profit (CVP) analysis, is used here to analyze the profitability on expansion of capacity by Ferro Plc. This is “because CVP analysis emphasizes the interrelationships of costs, quantity sold, and price, it brings together all of the financial information of the firm. CVP analysis can be a valuable tool in identifying the extent and magnitude of economic trouble a company is facing and helping pinpoint the necessary solution” (Don R Hansen and others, page 590)i. Following computations based on CVP analysis show that the contribution margin of each alternative is applied towards fixed expenses and the profitability of the entity. It must be noted that “variable costs vary directly with volume of sales or production.”(Noel Capon, page 596)ii. The above CVP analysis reveals that contribution margin at manufacturing of 4000 units is the maximum. Contribution margin is “the excess of selling price over variable cost. The selling price and variable cost being constant per unit of output, the contribution margin per unit is also a constant amount. The total contribution margin is used to meet the fixed cost, and the excess, if any, represent the profit” (N D Vohra, page 934)iii Naturally, the alternative that produces highest contribution margin per unit will be preferred as it will add more to the net profit margin of the entity. Contribution margin per unit is 20% for manufacturing 1000 units, and 25% for manufacturing 4000 units annually. The reason for this is the availability of benefit economies of scale only when the production exceeds 1000 units. The variable cost for production above 1000 units is £7500 per unit as compared to £8000 per unit when production is less than 1000 units. Accordingly the result of CVP analysis is that Ferro PLC should go in for annual production of 4000 unit. The issue whether Ferro Plc should enter into the market or not needs analysis from the point of view of rate of return on capital invested and the recovery of capital investment. Let us start with the rate of return this business will provide to Ferro Plc. The company’s capital investment structure will be comprised of 60 percent equity investment and 40 % of debt capital. Ferro Plc will have to first settle its hurdle rate of return or required rate of return from the project on its investment. Hurdle rate is “the minimum acceptable rate of return for a proposed project to merit investment. Usually the hurdle rate is the opportunity cost of capital or the best return the company could get by investing the capital elsewhere. To be financially justifiable, a project’s internal rate of return must exceed the hurdle rate set by the firm for such project.”(Paul M. Swamidass, page 286)iv In order to set a hurdle rate of return it is important to compute Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). The reason for this is that “the WACC approach begins with insight that projects of levered firms are simultaneously financed with both debt and equity” (Ross, page 576)v It is also important to note that “cost of capital is the rate of return that a firm must earn on the projects in which it invests to maintain the market value of its stock. It can also be thought of as rate of return required by market suppliers of capital to their funds to the firm. If risk is held constant, projects with rate of return above the cost of capital will increase the value of the firm, and projects with a rate of return below the cost of capital will decrease the value of the firm.” (Lawrence J. Gitman, page 498)vi As per information Ferro Plc will invest equity with a cost at 14% and cost of debt capital is estimated at 6%. It is assumed here that cost of debt capital is after tax to be held by Ferro Plc. With this much information already in hand, it is possible to compute WACC. This is because WACC “simply represents the average cost of each dollar of financing, no matter its source, that the firm uses to purchase assets.” (Scott Besley and Eugene F. Brigham, page 485)vii. In fact, WACC reflects the expected return on its future average investment in the long run. It is calculated by weighing the cost of each source of funding used in the capital structuring of the company. In our case the weight age is 60% for equity capital and 40% for the debt capital. Using these weights the WACC of Ferro Plc is compute as under: WACC = (W1 *K1) + (Ws * Kn), where W1 = Proportion of debt capital in total capital employed Ws = Proportion of ordinary shares in capital structure K1 = after tax cost of debt capital, and Kn = Cost of equity capital Accordingly WACC is computed as under: WACC = (40% * 6%) + (60% * 14%) = (0.40 * 0.6) + (0.60 * 0.14) = 0.24 + 0.84 =1.084 = 10.84% Accordingly, the required rate of return for Ferro Plc is at least 10.84%. Any project providing return more than 10.84% is considerable as per composition of capital structure of the company. In order to compare the require rate of return we need to know the return on the “Tensilite’ project under consideration. Certain assumptions for the purpose of computations of returns from the project are as under: Ferro Plc has installed manufacturing plant at capital cost of £10,000,000 to produce 4000 units annually The useful life of the manufacturing plant is three years. As the depreciation policy of the company is to deprecate fixed assets in equal installments over their useful lives, the yearly depreciation of £10,000,000 cost of manufacturing plant comes to £3,333,333. The computations are made both for 20% of the most likely view of forecast market (i.e. annual demand of 6500 units), as well as 30% of the same forecast market. Accordingly the sales at 20% of forecast market are 1300 units, and at 30% of forecast market are 1950 units. The company produces only units that are sold during the year. That means there no stocks at the end of the year. Similarly there are no closing stocks of raw material as well. The computations of earnings are based on CVP costing methods. Tax rate is assumed to be 30%. There are no accounts receivable and accounts payable at the end of year. Capital investments is computed as under: Cost of manufacturing plant 10000000 Marketing Cost 2000000 Additional annual fixed cost 1000000 Total Capital investment £ 13000000 Contribution of capital: 60% as equities 7800000 40% as debt capital 5200000 Finance charges on debt capital @ 6% per annum on 5200000 are £3122000. The computations of accounting rate of return for comparison with required rate of return are as under: The results of rate of return and profitability calculations above show that sale at 20% of the forecast would yield an annual profit of £1053267, and working at 30% of the forecast would yield £2855767. For comparison purposes accounting rate of return is computed. “Accounting rate of return measures the returns on a project in terms of income, as opposed to using a project’s cash flows. Income is not equal to cash flows because of accruals and deferrals used in its computation” (Don R. Hansen and others, page 718)viii Though accounting rate of return is not a perfect measure of rate of return, as are net present value and internal rate of return, but accounting rate is the best choice under the given circumstances. This is because we do not have any information about cash flows. The available information is only about one accounting period, and this information cannot be true for coming accounting periods as well. Accounting rate of return for activity at 20% of forecast is 5.85%, and at 30% of forecast it is 15.87%. The required rate of return as calculated earlier is 10.84%, taking into consideration the weighted costs of different constituents of capital structure of the company. The company needs to earn at least the required rate of return of 10.84%. The accounting rate of return at 30% of forecast in operation exceeds the required rate of return. Accordingly Ferro PLC should enter into the market only to capture 30% of the forecasted sales by spending extra marketing expenditure. There is no point in undertaking manufacturing at 20% of forecast even though the company saves £1000000 on account of marketing expenditure, as at this option the accounting rate of return is lower than required rate of return, i.e., weighted average capital cost of the company. However, the above assessment method is a crude way of assessment of a project because of following reasons: The assessment is based on only one period of performance, whereas the license is for a period of three years. Cash flows from the project are not at all considered Inflation, that is reality in every economy, has not been taken into account. Also “the main disadvantages are that profit and capital investment have many possible definitions, and the accounting rate of return does not take into account the time value of money” (Michael Jones, page 458)ix Let us evaluate the project on cash flow basis taking into considerations the future cash flows for three years. It is assumed that all previous assumptions remain the same. The method used here for evaluation of project is Net present value that encompasses discounting of future cash flows to find their present values. “Net present value is a capital investment appraisal technique which discounts future expected cash flows to today’s monetary values using an appropriate cost of capital.” (Michael Jones, page 461)x Under this method present value of future cash inflows is compared with cash outflows in order to arrive at the decision. “Discounted cash flows follow the fundamental economic principle that the value of an asset is the present value of expected cash flows from using the asset.” (Constance Lutolf Carroll and Antii Pirnes, 2009, page 396)xi. This method involves the process of finding the present value of future cash flows of the project under consideration. “The process is actually the inverse of compounding interest. Instead of finding future value of present dollar at a given rate, discounting determines the present value of future amount, assuming an opportunity to earn a certain return of money” (Lawrence J Gitman, 2006, page 169)xii. Ours is an inflationary economy, and inflation tends to distort decisions. “Failure to account for these trends in projecting cash flows can lead to serious enormous results, thereby giving misleading profitability estimates.”(A. Kayode Coker and Ernest E. Ludwig, page 101)xiii. Another factor that will impact discounted cash flow process is depreciation. “Depreciation charges are based on original rather than replacement cost” (James C. Von Horne, page 168)xiv. Therefore depreciation remains a constant amount, but it does not involve cash outflows. Therefore it is essential that “in estimating cash flows, it is important that the individual company take anticipated inflation into account.” (James C. Von Horne, page 169)xv Assuming that the inflation rate is 7% during all the three years, the computations of net present value based on discounted cash flows are as under. Computations as per discounted cash flow method suggest that net present values of discounted cash flows exceed the outflow of investment only under option where sales of 30% of the forecast is achieved. The first option of sales at 20% of the forecast is not suitable for Ferro Plc. Accordingly both methods of evaluation, accounting rate of return as well as net present value method using discounted cash flows, suggest that project should be undertaken at the proposal where sales of 30% of forecast is achieved. Only at this stage the required rate of return is achieved. Conclusion Financial tools used in this report for Ferro Plc indicate that the company should enter into the market by expanding its annual capacity up to 4000 units at the capital cost of adding manufacturing plant worth £10,000,000.The analysis revealed that undertaking 30% of the forecast market by incurring marketing expenses of £2,000,000 will only bring in profitability exceeding the required rate of return, that is the weighted average cost of capital for this project. Discounted cash flow based Net present value method has confirmed the results of computation of Accounting rate of return method in deciding about the course of action to be followed by Ferro Plc. Moreover the effects of inflation and other business factors have also confirmed that evaluation based theoretical financial techniques are fruitful in taking project decision for Ferro Plc. Word Count: 2450 References Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Financial Tools of Ferro Plc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words, n.d.)
Financial Tools of Ferro Plc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words. https://studentshare.org/management/1740388-finance-for-manager
(Financial Tools of Ferro Plc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
Financial Tools of Ferro Plc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/1740388-finance-for-manager.
“Financial Tools of Ferro Plc Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/management/1740388-finance-for-manager.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Financial Tools of Ferro Plc

Next Plc Financial Reporting

In the financial statements of Next plc, sales increased by 3.... Their usefulness is being diluted as the modern companies Next plc are holding fewer current assets to generate revenue.... 5 From the above analysis, Next plc is a company which can meet its short term obligations in both year 2013 and year 2012, however at a closer look, it shows that it has decreased its ability to meet these short term obligations in the year 2013 which is a fall back from the previous period....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Management dissertation 1

(Annual Report and financial Statements, 2009) Before carrying out a steady study on the stated issue it becomes important to have a review of the literature on such topic for consideration.... It has been observed at a high intensity that the most important resource for an organization's overall development remains to be its people and the customers whom it is serving to....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Financial Performance of La Suite Plc

This paper "Financial Performance of La Suite plc" focuses on the fact that the analysis of the chief executive report regarding the performance of the company is analyzed along with the financial statements of La Suite plc, so as to realize the potential and the viability of the new project.... nbsp; … The circulation sent by the chief executive of the company is analyzed in details regarding the financial performance of the company along with the evaluation of the costs of the new project of building a 400-bedroom hotel....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Analysing specific financial issues in Oxford Instruments PLC

To achieve this objective, a thorough analysis of the financial statements of the company is one of the critical and most essential… Investors therefore need to perform the analysis of financial statements including performing ratio analysis to ascertain the financial health of the company besides gaining insight into the financial future of the company. Oxford Instruments plc is a UK The company has a vision to actually turn smart science into viable and affordable commercial products which can be easily available to the target market....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Gross Profit Margin of the Orange Company

This gross profit is desirable since it shows that the company's financial health is good.... The company maintains a current ratio that is above in both the two financial years implying that the company's liquidity position is at a fair place since it can easily offset its current obligations with its current assets....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Financial Management in the Jovi plc Company

This paper 'Financial Management in the Jovi plc Company" focuses on the fact that the Financial Management deals with areas like determining Financial needs, selecting the sources of funds, financial analysis, and interpretation, Cost Volume Profit Analysis, Capital Budgeting.... Company Jovi plc is more concerned about the utilization of money in the most effective way.... The problem company Jovi plc is facing in the financial area is that there is no proper cash flow, which in turn leading to no funds for further investment as well as to pay a dividend....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Market Strategy Planning and Effective Communication

This assignment explores the market strategy planning and effective communication as one of the most crucial aspects of a firm entering a new market.... nbsp; And the author of the paper states that the marketing mix is one of the most credible strategies for the organizations.... hellip; According to the findings, it can, therefore, be said that the organizations need to adapt to the wide spectrum of environmental elements of the new markets primarily because market strategies need to be tailored according to the environmental conditions of the place....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Arsenal PLC: Financial Statements 2009/10

The objective of Arsenal Holding plc's 2009-2010 financial statement is to provide information about the financial position, performance, and changes in financial position of an entity that is useful to wide range of users in making economic decisions.... hellip; The most important matter is the treatment of players as assets in the financial statement of Arsenal.... There are arguments both for and against including the value of players, and these arguments underline the difficulties of financial reporting and auditing....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us