StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Bargaining Game - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Bargaining Game" highlights that the ultimate game is a type of bargaining game that involves two players namely the proposer and the responder who is given money to share in the ratio they feel most comfortable with…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Bargaining Game
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Bargaining Game"

Draft Does Competition Affect Social Preferences In The Context Of A Bargaining Game? Discuss. Number: Introduction Various experiments have been carried out in order to establish the effects of competition on social preferences particularly in the context of bargaining game. This essay will focus on the ultimatum game as one of the major bargaining game as well as focusing on the carried out studies about the same topic to establish whether competition has any effects on the social preferences. Social preferences in this case are referring to the partialities covered in experimental economics, behavioral as well as social psychology that comprises of interpersonal elements such as fairness, equity, altruism, and reciprocity. Economics approach on these social preferences assumes that people are rationale and prioritize their personal interests before those of the other people. On the other hand, bargaining games are defined as a situation whereby at least two or more players are required to get into a consensus concerning how to share a given amount of goods, money, opportunities, or any other resource that might be of common interest (Wilkinson and Klaes,  2008, p22). In bargaining games, both parties try their level best to get the most favorable deal by getting into a fair agreement with the other party. Bargaining in labor unions, directors’ negotiation for wage increase as well as dispute between two communities or parties over distribution of a certain resources, territories among other elements are good examples of bargaining games (Wilkinson and Klaes,  2008, p23). To explain how competition affects social preferences, the writer will first focus on the Ultimate Game model. Ultimatum Game (UG) refers to a popular test that is used to analyze specific bargaining behaviors. It is a test of self-interested model that involves two players interacting to decide how to share a given amount of money. The game is commonly applied in economic experiments and the condition behind the game is that the two players must not be familiar with each other and that the game must be played only once between these two particular players. In this case, one of the players becomes the proposer while the other one becomes the responder. Both the required to share a given amount of money with the proposer being the main determinant of the mode of division to be used. The responder is given an option of either accepting the proposer’s offer or declining it, in case the offer is accepted, both get the amount shared according to how the proposer had made the offer, if the respondent declines it, both parties walk away with nothing (Camerer, 2003, p55). According to economist’s models, it is assumed that players are supposed to be rational and selfish, meaning that the proposer will offer the smallest share possible to the responder. On the other hand, the responder is expected to accept the given offer since declining it would simply mean that he or she would get nothing. Carried out experiments show that responders who keep on demanding more are likely to get more even though related studies show that players hardly apply rational strategy. Occasionally, offers made the proposer range between 40% and 50%, while on the hand there is a very high likelihood of responders rejecting offers that are below 20%. However, it appears that most people are interested with the interests of the other people in the competition and are highly sensitive to fairness and cooperation. This makes both parties to get a lower outcome than they would have gained if they could have acted according to the self-interested model. During the process of playing the Ultimate Game (UG), it is clear that people are not just interested with material rewards only, but also emotional (psychological satisfaction) (Camerer, 2003, p46). This puts the responder in a difficult dilemma of whether to reject the offer or to accept it especially if the offer is highly unfair. Many experiments have shown that most of the responders who are given unfair offers tend to go through a difficult moment of emotional conflict, wondering whether to reject the offer on basis of unfairness or simply accept it on rationale basis since rejecting the offer would mean losing even the small amount that he or she was likely to get. Rejection of the offer rarely occurs unless the responder’s anger to unfairness supersedes his or her rational choice of accepting the given offer (Kahneman, and Tversky, 2000, p26). In most cases, this occurs as the responder try to punish the proposer for unfair and selfish treatment by making him or her loose the money. In this case, the word fair refers to the ratio that both parties may feel most comfortable to share the given amount of money and not necessarily an equivalent splitting of the reward (Camerer, 2003, p55). The evenness of the game can be illustrated using Nash equilibrium analysis whereby it is assumed that the smallest amount of money or goods available is x and the amount is divisible in 1 unit amount. According to the theory of self-interest hypothesis, the responder is likely to be given 1 unit by the proposer, which in this case is referred to as the equilibrium. The offer made by the proposer is (x, 100-x) and the responder is likely to accept any offer that is close to 100-x. This is referred to as the Nash equilibrium and is highly determined by the credibility of the strategy applied by the responder. This is because the proposer who is both selfish and rationale knows that there is a very high probability of the responder accepting any offer that is almost fair since it would be worth rather than getting nothing. This makes the proposer make the lowest possible offer to the responder meaning that the proposer is likely to get the highest amount of money. Social preferences of the players seem to match with self-interest hypothesis in a well competitive environment. This model is applicable in a number of situations whereby competition is involved. It is both applicable in the market and non-market bargaining like in solving political disputes between countries and communities just to mention a few. The model also shows how competition can affect social preferences in the market environment such as in labor disputes, bargain for salary increment, and bargain for acquisition of important economic resources among others. There exists a general presumption that if the level of competition in the market place is very high, social preferences are likely to be negatively affected. Theoretical results as well as experiments carried out about market claims that high levels if competition makes people behave in a selfish manner and tend to forget social aspects such as fairness, equity altruism, and reciprocity. This can be used as the base for explaining the anomalies experienced in the labor and other markets related situations (Camerer, 2003, p55). Numerous market experiments have been conducted beginning with Smith (1962 and 1964) experiments about market competition to the theoretical research by Fehr and Schmidt in 1999 (Chaudhuri, 2009, p28). According to the studies, it was revealed that competition makes market participants to behave in a self-interested manner. However, some other studies show that there exist a relatively large number of people who are not just self-interested. They show that some people care about the wellbeing or the interests of the other people despite the situation that they may be subjected to be it competition in the job market or any other. These studies signify that some people are always willing to promote fairness irrespective of its cost, which may at times involve sacrificing their own resources or desires. Nevertheless, the studies show that even though these individuals are willing to make sacrifices for the sake of preserving social preferences, it only occurs to people who know each other and people who have helped one another in one way or another. This is unlike the theoretical analysis by Fehr and Schmidt of 1999 about ultimatum game, which was portraying both the responder and the proposer as rationale self-interested persons. Other controversial studies show that social preferences are irrelevant irrespective of the level of competition in the market place. Experiments have also shown that social preferences tend to magnify if the parties involved interact repeatedly to a point of getting to know each other better or forming relational contracts (Chaudhuri, 2009, p35). It may also be magnified if the proposer is looking for a reputation for his or her trustworthy conduct. In conclusion, social preferences may or may not be affected by the level of competition in the market and non-market place. Some studies have shown that most of the people not only care about their interests but also the wellbeing of other people they relate with. The question of whether social preferences are affected by the level of competition can therefore be termed as controversial since some people tend to care about the interests of other people while others seem never to mind about the welfare of other people. This is highly determined by personal traits of the involved individuals as well as their motive among other aspects. Studies show that people tend to observe social preferences in case they know each other, or if the proposer is likely to get a reputation out of his or her good social conduct. According to the Ultimate Game model, both the proposer and the responder are assumed to be rational and selfish individuals whereby the proposer is expected to make the lowest offer possible to the responder. In most cases, responders tend to accept the given offer unless their emotions such as anger and frustrations supersede their rational reasoning hence deciding to reject the offer primarily so as to punish the proposer. Ultimate game is a type of bargaining game that involves two players namely the proposer and the responder who are given a certain amount of money to share in the ratio they feel most comfortable with. The proposer makes an offer to the responders where by the responder bargains for an increase especially if he or she feels that the offer was unfair. Most experiments show that proposer make their first offer within the range of 40 to 50% with offers less than 20% being rejected. The almost equivalent offer made by the proposer signifies that most of the people in the society or in the market place tend to be mindful of the interests of the other people in the same organization. Therefore, the answer on the question of whether competition has an effect on the social preferences particularly the bargaining game can be both positive (yes) or negative (no) as explained in the essay. Bibliography Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. New York, N.Y: Russell Sage Foundation. Chaudhuri, A. 2009. Experiments in economics: Playing fair with money. London: Routledge. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 2000. Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge University Press Wilkinson, N., & Klaes, M. 2008. An introduction to behavioral economics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Does competition affect social preferences in the context of a Essay”, n.d.)
Does competition affect social preferences in the context of a Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1632825-does-competition-affect-social-preferences-in-the-context-of-a-bargaining-game-discuss
(Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Essay)
Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Essay. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1632825-does-competition-affect-social-preferences-in-the-context-of-a-bargaining-game-discuss.
“Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1632825-does-competition-affect-social-preferences-in-the-context-of-a-bargaining-game-discuss.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Does Competition Affect Social Preferences in the Context of a Bargaining Game

Sony PlayStation 3

'How and When Do Brand Perceptions and preferences First Form' A Cognitive Developmental Investigation'.... When Prophecy Fails: A social and Psychological Study of A Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World, by Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter.... This report does not attempt to cover all of these headings and subsets but rather it focuses on three distinct but interrelated areas that are crucial to a) understanding the marketplace in which the Sony PlayStation product is operating and b) implementing strategies in that marketplace to both enhance customer value and improve Sony's business performance....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

The New Human Resource Management Approach

Some scholars believe, the new HRM approach, while paying lip service to the ‘best resources' concept, has set its policies and practices on a course that is inconsistent with the traditional industrial relations and collective bargaining systems.... Consequently, in Britain, mass unemployment of the 1980s and various legislations that curtailed union activities have had a marked effect on the bargaining power of labour because of the reduction in trade union membership and institutional protection....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Acquisition of Minecraft by Microsoft

7 billion in 2014 on the heels of revenues of over $86 billion in the same year, determined it could improve its revenue procurement and strategic position through the acquisition of Mojang so as to maintain ownership of the firm's most popular game, Minecraft.... Minecraft is a video game software program developed by the company Mojang and released in 2009.... One of the most fundamental threats to Microsoft, when considering Porter's model, is the bargaining power of suppliers....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

Key Elements of the Marketing Mix of Sony's PlayStation

Hardcore gamers are influenced their perception and lifestyle for wanting game consoles with greater capabilities and high-performance technology.... Casual gamers are influenced by the price and availability of video game programs.... Also, there is no direct pricing competition between the three market players as each console is different from the others....
14 Pages (3500 words) Term Paper

Marketing Plan: Xbox 360

Along with this, the company can focus on establishing strong relationships with retailers and game developers in order to take advantage of co-marketing.... In this regard, it will be beneficial to change or alter the 4 P's of the marketing mix in accordance with the needs of the target market Microsoft has been able to capture a large share of the market, despite the intense competition in the industry....
16 Pages (4000 words) Term Paper

Competitive Advantage for Aldi Using the VRIO Framework

The company also emphasises offering regular discounts for the customers on its products and services, which helps it to sustain itself in the UK market for a longer period despite stiff competition from Tesco and other well-known retail giants.... From the above analysis, it is apparent that the impact of present retail food industry structure of UK is quite intense and the rivalry amid the competitors is quite intense....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

Strategic Bilateral Environmental Aid and Trans-Border Pollution

nlike binding multilateral environmental conventions or the commercial licensing of environmental production technologies, intergovernmental environmental bargaining to reduce trans-border pollution has remained active in the recent past.... The bargaining outcomes, if implemented successfully, are certainly related to the Pareto principle for improving environmental aid....
35 Pages (8750 words) Term Paper

Barclays Premier League and Manchester United

Economic- The direction and nuances of the economy with respect to growth, inflation, consumer income, cost of living standards, unemployment and other factors that in this case would impact game attendance and merchandise purchases of a football club.... Barclays Premier League - Advances in computer-aided game enhancements have helped to improve the entertainment value of the sport as a result of statistics, freeze frames, instant replays and other advances that help to break down the game for viewers in every aspect (Telegraph, 2009)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us