StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Justice Criminal Evidence - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Justice Criminal Evidence" presents that the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 states that if a confession is obtained by “oppression will not be admitted…” Hence, oppression as laid out under this Section of the Act was much more broad-based…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
Justice Criminal Evidence
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Justice Criminal Evidence"

Law of Evidence The Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 19841 s that if a confession is obtained by “oppression..[it] will not be admitted…” Hence, oppression as laid out under this Section of the Act was much more broad based and confessions improperly obtained could be excluded2. The dictionary definition was laid out in the case of R v Fulling where it was defined as “the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, harsh or wrongful manner, unjust or cruel treatment of subjects, inferiors,….the imposition of unreasonable or unjust burdens”3 Lord Lane refused to follow the previous authorities and exclude the confession, because the confession obtained in the Fulling case did not involve any deliberate impropriety on the part of the officer who obtained it. No intimidation was used, there was no bullying or hectoring, hence they could not be held to be oppressive. However, Dennis points out that the danger arising from the exclusions inherent in the definition of oppression in Fulling as follows: “The effect is that both the English and Australian Acts allow for the possibility of other, undefined, cases to fall within the prohibition on the use of oppression.”4 Similarly in the case of Lam Chi-ming v the Queen, Lord Griffiths also explained the rationale for Section 76(2) in rejecting improperly obtained confessions, not only due to “possible unreliability, but upon the principle that a man cannot be compelled to incriminate himself.”5 Exclusion of such confessions is also mandated by civilized society that requires the police to behave properly with those in their custody. (b) The general position in law has been that even when a confession is made voluntarily, the Courts have a residual discretion to exclude it in order to preserve the fairness of the trial. Where the question of inducement by an authority to elicit the confession by creating fear or hope of advantage arises, it must necessarily be excluded. However, Lord Lane articulates the view that an involuntary confession cannot be withheld as evidence, merely on the grounds of what the police had done or omitted to do.6 The difficulty of establishing implied inducement is his criterion for the statement that every voluntary statement will become inadmissible if the motives of authorities are to be assessed, because the police are interested in solving cases. However, Lord’s Lane’s statement cannot be applied indiscriminately, because of the limitations identified above as the general position in law. 2. Counsel may not be allowed to cross examine Julie about her previous complaint against Jack which was dropped. Since Julie is the complainant, her prior character will not be considered a fact at issue unless she is being defamed.7 It is the Plaintiff who adduces evidence rather than the defendant and the general rule established in law is that prior evidence on a person’s character will be considered irrelevant if it is not a probative issue.8 It will not be admissible unless it is relevant to the issue before the Court9 because evidence on prior misconduct could be prejudicial to the interests of the parties. Therefore when evidence cannot be admitted, it is unlikely that Jack’s attorney will be able to cross examine Julie. (b) It is possible that Julie’s father may be allowed to testify in Court, if it has allowed evidence about Julie’s prior false complaint to be admitted in Court. Although Julie’s father’s statement would fall under the category of hearsay evidence, nevertheless when a witness (Julie) is giving testimony, she can be questioned about statements made outside court on a previous occasion, to demonstrate inconsistency in statements. Under the changes in hearsay provisions that have recently been made10 such statements are evidence of the facts they contain, so Julie’s father may be allowed in court to confirm the evidentiary fact in Julie’s prior statement that she had invented the whole story. 3(a). A child witness under the age of 16 would automatically qualify as a vulnerable witness11 especially when complaining about a sexual offence.12 Such a witness can be called to appear personally in Court through a Special measures Direction, whereby the witness may be allowed to provide testimony via video, or from behind a protective screen or over a live television link.13 (b) The special provision in Section 21 specifies that any witness that qualifies as a child as per section 16 and is under the age of 16, would automatically be entitled to special protection, especially if the witness is appearing in Court in relation to a sexual offence or kidnapping. Therefore, the Court can allow a Special measures Direction so that the child can safely give evidence without being exposed in the open Court. However, this primary rule may be limited by the availability of the special measure and cannot be implemented if unavailable14. The Court may also disallow this provision if its application will not maximize the quality of evidence in any way removed from normal testimony procedures in Court.15 (c) “The jury is warned that just because the special measure of an intermediary interrogator in the person of this Court appointed lawyer has been made available to the witness, this does not justify a prejudicial conclusion that the defendant Paulo is dangerous.”16 4. The evidence about Jacob’s previous offences and convictions is likely to fall under the evidence of character which cannot be adduced17 so it may be inadmissible since it is difficult for a person to establish a uniform propriety of conduct throughout his life18. This is the argument that the defendants are likely to offer against introducing evidence about Jacob’s prior confessions. They may also argue that evidence about Jacob being encouraged by his parents is likely to be irrelevant to the material facts of the case and that it should therefore be excluded. As opposed to this, the Prosecution is likely to press for the inclusion of such evidence. They are likely to argue that such evidence is probative to the issue of the crime for which Jacob is being accused. The evidence in question confirms Jacob’s prior misconduct19 and may therefore be admissible. They are likely to argue that such evidence is important and relevant with substantial probative value because of the relevance of such disposition to the facts of the case20. They may also argue that evidence about Jacob and his parents may be permissible for admission, because it is in the nature of important explanatory evidence.21 (b) Further information would be necessary in arriving at a decision as to whether or not such evidence can be admitted. In order to avoid prejudicing the interests of Jacob, it is important that the probative value of the evidence be assessed. In order to do that, evidence can be requested from the Plaintiffs on Jacob’s former convictions, including the nature of the charges and the sentence, if nay, that was meted out. In addition, the testimony of Belle would also be necessary before any decisions could be made on whether evidence on Jacob’s past character is relevant to establish his guilt in relation to the circumstances of this particular case. I would seek Belle’s statement of examination in chief and cross examination before deciding whether it allows grounds for including evidence on prior character. (c) As a general rule, I would not admit such evidence, since the issue before consideration by the Court is in regard to a specific offence committed by Jacob against Belle. Including evidence of past character would be akin to prejudicing Jacob’s interests because he cannot be expected to show uniform propriety of conduct throughout his life, as pointed out in the case of Scott v Sampson. This could result in a compromising of the process of justice. References: * Allen, Trevor, 1992. “Implied assertions as hearsay.” New Law Journal, 142 (6566): 1194 * Dennis, Iain, 1996. “The admissibility of Confessions under Sections 84 and 85 of the Evidence Act 1995: An English Perspective.” Sydney Law Review, 18: 34 at pp 38 * Tapper, Colin, 1995. “The erosion of Boardman v DPP” New Law Journal, 145 (6708) : 1223 Cases cited: * Cornwell v Myskow (1987) 2 All ER 504 * Lam Chi-Ming v The Queen (1991) 2 AC 212 at 220 E-F * Makin v AG NSW (1894) AC 57 * R v MacPherson (1981) 147 CLR 512 * R v Fulling (1987) 2 All ER 65 * R v Rennie (1982) 1 All ER 385 * Scott v Sampson (1882) 8 QBD 491 at 503-505 * Secretary of State for trade and industry v Coulthard (1997) 1 BCLC 329 Legisation cited: * Criminal Justice Act of 2003 * Youth, Justice Criminal Evidence Act of 1999 * Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Justice Criminal Evidence Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4, n.d.)
Justice Criminal Evidence Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4. https://studentshare.org/law/1541746-law-of-evidence
(Justice Criminal Evidence Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4)
Justice Criminal Evidence Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4. https://studentshare.org/law/1541746-law-of-evidence.
“Justice Criminal Evidence Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4”. https://studentshare.org/law/1541746-law-of-evidence.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Justice Criminal Evidence

Exclusion of Evidence in Criminal Justice

One of the provisions of these amendments is the right to exclude evidence that is illegally obtained from the trial (Colb, 2011).... Laws that deal will exclusion of evidence are sometimes marred by a conspicuous lack of clarity.... This is especially as regards exclusion of evidence.... Some of the questions to be taken into consideration include an example of a case where excluding evidence changed the outcome of the case....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs

The assignment "evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs" presents the author's thoughts.... Once that happens, you must ask yourself has this person been rehabilitated or will he/she exhibited the same criminal behavior and return to jail/prison.... Jails/prisons do not house most offenders for life nor does prison confinement stop criminal behaviors, rather they take away the opportunity for an offender to commit a crime for a short time or is depended upon sentencing....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Law of Criminal Evidence

The paper "Law of criminal evidence" describes that experts have expressed concerns about the validity of hearsay evidence in the trial process and the undermining of the criminal justice process itself and it remains to be seen whether the hearsay provisions of the Criminal Justice Act of 2003.... The Police and criminal evidence Act of 19844 has also been amended by the Criminal Justice and Police Act of 20015, to permit law enforcement officials to retain DNA samples....
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study

Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Justice

The paper "Hearsay evidence in Criminal Justice" highlights that the CJA 2003 does not have all the answers.... This would not be such a worry if we kept our evidence rules under constant review, but experience suggests it may be a good long while before we see any further attempts at reform.... The process of determining the admissibility of the “hearsay” evidence still depends in important respects on judicial discretion that is more often than not, not made suitable for application by lay magistrates and is often exercised inconsistently in the Crown Court....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

Law of Evidence: The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

The author analyzes Billy's case according to the criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and states that all in all the chances of Billy being able to get a right to appeal are narrow and based on the genuineness of his epileptic state and the reliance on his solicitor's advice.... According to the criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA), s.... e have been told that in the question that the judge has already given a direction that, pursuant to section 34 of the criminal justice and Public Order Act 1994, a proper inference could be drawn from Billy's silence at interview....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Reliability of Evidence

"Reliability of evidence" paper states that the reliability of evidence is indeed an issue of debate, a factor that indeed calls for a measure of not only fairness but also accuracy within the criminal justice system.... nbsp; The above case presents one of the many cases that have put into question the reliability of evidence.... With the major purpose of crime scene investigations being the recognition and collection of evidence, a number of forensic techniques are used....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Causing Grievous Bodily Harm Against Ex-Girlfriend

The paper "Causing Grievous Bodily Harm Against Ex-Girlfriend" highlights that evidence available in support of the suspect or against him can be considered as valuable support to justify the positions of both the ends and even develop a proper theory of crime.... hellip; The evidence of Dale's ex-girlfriend is even going to act as positive evidence that supports the development of a proper justification for the action that could have possibly been committed by him at a certain point of time....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Evidence Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence Section

evidence Admissibility of Hearsay evidence Section 116 Criminal Justice Act 2003Section 116 of the Criminal Justice Act of 2003One aspect of witness testimony bears special mention.... Hearsay is anything not based upon the personal knowledge of a evidence Admissibility of Hearsay evidence Section 116 Criminal Justice Act 2003Section 116 of the Criminal Justice Act of 2003One aspect of witness testimony bears special mention....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us