StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Agreement between Lewis & Co and Whizz - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Agreement between Lewis & Co and Whizz" states that Lewis & co received information about a special promotional offer for the supply of PCs by Bang plc, which represents better value in terms of specification and price than the terms of Whizz PC Ltd. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.8% of users find it useful
Agreement between Lewis & Co and Whizz
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Agreement between Lewis & Co and Whizz"

BUSINESS LAW List all the requirements that must be met for a contract to exist between Taite, Lewis & co and Whizz plc. A contract is a "promise" or an "agreement" that is enforced or recognised by the law. In the civil law, contracts are considered to be part of the general law of obligations. The requirements that must be met for a contract to exist between Taite, Lewis & co and Whizz plc are as follows: -> Offer and Acceptance: - In this case, the primary requirement would be a properly constituted offer to be made by the partners of Taite, Lewis & co to Whizz PC Ltd. The offer made should be in written and should clearly state all the necessary details like pricing list, time duration and so on. Acceptance would be the agreed consent of Whizz PC Ltd on the offer being laid down by Taite, Lewis & co. -> Intention to create legal relationship: - When these two parties agrees to enter into an agreement, they must be an intention on part of the parties, to create a legal relationship, in the absence of such an intention, the agreement does not become a contract. -> Lawful Consideration: Consideration means something in return, it is an advantage or benefit moving from one party to other. In this case it would be the promise or the consent to pay £545 for each PC to be purchased from Whizz PC Ltd. -> Capacities and Competence of the parties to contract: Both the parties involved must be competent to contract. It is highly essential to see that both the parties are qualified under the legal considerations. -> Certainty and Possibility of Performance: The contract between the partners of Taite, Lewis & co to Whizz PC Ltd must consist the features of certainty, clarity and possibility to perform. Besides these requirements all the legal formalities like registration, stamp, witness, signatures etc are also needed. Generally speaking, as most of the requirements were not being considered and met between the two involved parties it could not be considered as a proper or a good contract. 2. Explain, with reference to legal principles and decided cases, the legal effect of the brochure and price list sent to Taite, Lewis & co on 22 January and the firm’s order on 27 January. On 22 January Whizz PC Ltd sent the firm its brochure, which gave information about each of its models, including the specifications, together with a price list. The contractual price or the procedure of its establishment is set forth in the contract; if it has not been established and the parties have not agreed otherwise, it could have been a different case. Moreover, on 27 January the partners of Taite, Lewis & Co have placed an order in written but it should be noted this order had a further inquiry and could not be considered as a complete purchase order. As a matter of fact there could be no legal effect of the brochure and price list being sent to Taite, Lewis & Co and this price list and brochure could be simply considered as the general purchase information about the products being offered by Whizz PC Ltd. And the order which was being sent by the partners of Taite, Lewis & Co could be considered as a further inquiry proposal. 3. Analyze and explain, with reference to legal principles and decided cases, the legal effect of the events that occur after the firm’s order on 27 January. On the purchased order being sent on 27 January, a further inquiry about the product specifications were being made. But the actions and events which occurred after the firm’s order on 27 January implies few legal considerations. After receiving the purchase order Whizz PC Ltd replied using one of its standard form briefing few specific things – such as terms and conditions, payment date etc. Again a revised form was sent by Whizz PC Ltd agreeing to the conditions laid by the partners of Taite, Lewis & Co. and clearly mentioning that if the firm wishes Whizz PC Ltd to be the supplier then a confirmation of the order has to be sent within seven days of the date on the form. These events clearly gives the implications of legal considerations which could be laid down by Whizz PC Ltd on the partners of Taite, Lewis & Co in case if the later breaches the contract. But on considering further activities which have taken place, certain legal obligations come into picture. Here in this case “time” factors play an important role. It is quite evident that Whizz PC have received cancellation order prior to purchase order i.e., they have received the cancellation order on February 9 whereas the purchase order from the partners on February 10. This could be the reason of postal delay and if Taite, Lewis & Co have mentioned that they are not responsible for any postal delay on their purchase order then as such there could be no legal issues for them and if nothing is mention about the postal delay still this would be considered in their favor as per the legal principles. 4. Explain, with reference to legal principles and decided cases, what the terms of the contract are in relation to the payment of the purchase price. Price, pricing, payment terms, payment date all these plays pivotal role in any contract formed between different parties. There are few instances when the price is not mentioned and at such time the price is fixed at the mutual understandings and consent of the involved parties. It is highly advisable to mention all these specifications when entering into a contract so that further any legal obligations can be solved with much ease. In this case we could see a good deal of activities which have taken place over the pricing factor. These activities were based on the negotiation whereby the offerer is seen negotiating the price and the services to be provided and later the offeree putting forward their conditions and finally there is a mutual agreement between both the parties related to the price and the extra services being provided. The primary thing which should be considered in this case is that the contact formed could not be termed as a contract; it was more or less like an agreement upon which both of the parties agreed to proceed. But later they could not proceed as one of the party accepted a good and more advantageous proposal of a third party which is very much acceptable when we consider few cases and the legal principles. Thus, as such there could be no specific considerations for the terms of the contract in relation to the payment of the purchase price. 5. Explain, with reference to legal principles and decided cases, the impact, if any, of the following events on the existence of a contract between Whizz PC Ltd and the firm. The major impact which these circumstances have on the existence of a contract between Whizz PC Ltd and the firm is that due to the later contract the former becomes null or void. In this case the first party was still in the process of making agreement with the second party during which it gets a good offer from the third party and finding this offer as more profitable it accepts it. Thus the agreement which was supposed to be form between the first and the second party becomes null or void. Here the first party is the partners of Taites, Lewis & Co who were in need of few computers and were willing to make purchase of computers from Whizz PC. An agreement based on mutual understandings was formed after few negotiations about the extra specifications and services. The purchase order was released but due to postal delay it reached Whizz PC late and during this tenure the partners got a good proposal from Bang Plc and considering it more profitable than the proposal of Whizz PC Ltd, the partners opted for this and sent the cancellation order to Whizz PC Ltd. It could not be even considered as a cancellation order, as the agreement was not yet finalized. It so happened that Lewis & co received information about a special promotional offer for the supply of PCs by Bang plc, which represents better value in terms of specification and price than the terms of Whizz PC Ltd. The partners wrote immediately to Whizz PC Ltd withdrawing their offer and thus the agreement between the partners and Whizz PC gets terminated. REFERENCES: -> Emerson Robert W, (2003) - Business Law Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4”, n.d.)
Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1536161-business-law
(Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4)
Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4. https://studentshare.org/law/1536161-business-law.
“Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1536161-business-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Agreement between Lewis & Co and Whizz

Questions in Antitrust law. Case examples

Antitrust laws are body of governing principles that seek to enhance favorable business environment through promoting fair competition as well as protecting consumers in addition to wronged competitor businesses against anti-competitive practices within the business environment.... ... ... ... Antitrust laws are body of governing principles that seek to enhance favorable business environment through promoting fair competition as well as protecting consumers in addition to wronged competitor businesses against anti-competitive practices within the business environment....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John

In the case of the lewis vs.... Averay, lewis sells a car to a person who claimed to be Richard Greene, with a Cheque (450) which later is dishonored the fraudulent person then sells the car to Averay (200) (P Atiyah and F Bennion 1961).... Name: Institution: CONTRACTS OF LAW: CASE between KEITH AND JOHN When a mistake, which considered, to be grave by the law happens to entered into a contract then, the contract is deemed as void (Burrows 2011)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Complaint against the Board of Directors

As fiduciaries, directors owe the shareholders of the corporation and the corporation as a whole a duty of loyalty and duty of care (Aronson v lewis).... The paper "The Complaint against the Board of Directors" states that Sally offers to mortgage her home to ensure that the company gets off to a good start and is ensured of a greater chance of becoming profitable....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Basic Elements of a Valid Contract

whizz PC Ltd becomes the offeror and Taite, Lewis, and Co become the offeree.... This was the case when whizz PC Ltd sent its brochure to the Taite, Lewis, and Co firm.... n 27 of January, the partners of Taite, Lewis and Co-wrote to whizz PC ltd placing an order for 20 of the whiz 4000 PCs stipulating that the price of 500 Pounds must include installation and a 24 months onsite repair/troubleshooting service.... The invitation of treat sent by whizz, PC Ltd did not specify installation and onsite repair/troubleshooting as part of the 500 pounds cost of each machine....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Looking at Covenants Licences and Leases

Addressing the issue of privity of contract first it can be noted that as Target And Leslie PLC are the original parties to the contract there is both privity of contract1 and privity of estate between the parties.... When Target assigned the lease to Ace he created a new relationship between Ace and Leslie Plc.... As there is no contractual relationship between Ace and Leslie the relationship between these would only be one of privity of estate....
11 Pages (2750 words) Case Study

Co-ownership of Land Property

The paper "co-ownership of Land Property" highlights that for co-habitants who have spent so many years together without the blessings of marriage, it is often unfair for the parties to come out as having no share at all in the properties which they both enjoyed while they were together.... For co-habitants who have spent so many years together without the blessings of marriage, it is often unfair for the parties to come out as having no share at all in the properties which they both enjoyed while they were together....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

The Companies Act 2006

ne of the crucial aspects of legal interpretation in this case study is the time of contract formation between Bertram and Craft&co.... Key aspects of the legislation comprise of small business, restructuring the law to make it easier and more cost-effective to operate a small company, promotion of shareholder engagement, enhancing powers available to proxies and increasing the rights of indirect investors, reform of the audit system to increase auditor liability and enhance audit quality, the codification of directors duties and reform and modernization of company law as a whole (Gary Scanlan and Mark lewis, 2007)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Validity of the Contract, the Damages and Defenses for a Breach of Contract

contract is referred to as an agreement between two parties which either creates an obligation for doing or refraining from doing a certain thing.... Consideration means that the two parties must have something of legally sufficient value that is being exchanged between them such as services or money.... ased on mutual agreement, both parties must have an understanding of the agreement and make sure that no mistake exists between the two.... Therefore, the parties that enter into agreements or contracts are protected by law to ensure that the signed content in the agreement is enforced and followed up to every word by the parties (LeRoy & Jentz, 2008)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us