StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Who Are You: Plato and Aristotel - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the paper titled "Who Are You: Plato and Aristotle" argues that the brain, as well as the soul, are two completely different matters. The soundness of the claims is seen in the fact that it is may be supported by the work of famous philosophers…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.7% of users find it useful
Who Are You: Plato and Aristotel
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Who Are You: Plato and Aristotel"

Who are you Part One: Area of Philosophy One may hardly make a mistake suggesting that the problem in question should be viewed within the area of Metaphysics as the controversy is focused on certain abstract as well as non material objects. As for a definite philosophical problem, one should point out that the text puts emphasis on the relationship between body and soul as well as whether it is possible to for one to exist without the other. Thus, the problem employs some fantastic technology and it focuses on the result of such actions: whether a person will remain the same. Part Two: Argument Analysis The first friend philosopher that will be asked to share his views on the situation in question is Plato. He will point out that soul is a non material substance that was hardly be transplanted with the help of a part of brain as the latter does not contain it in the strict meaning of this verb (Elkaisy-Friemuth and Dillon 2). One of the most important assumptions that are made by this kind of thinking is that if a body does, the soul is released free and there is no way to return it. It is understandable that Plato is not able to present any factual evidence to support his claims. That is why it would be logical to treat his position from the point of view of speculation as well as personal interpretation of the facts as Plato primarily refers to different consideration and logical models in order to convince the audience. The second friend who will express his opinion about the situation in question is Aristotle. His main argument will be focused on the idea that soul is closely connected to the body. Therefore, it is possible to influence the former with the help of the latter (Johansen 119). The most important assumption in this case is that if one locates the part of the body where the soul is, it is possible to remove it and place into a different body. Speaking of the factual evidence, Aristotle might suggest that unhealthy body is not able to produce a sound soul. While this evidence is factual, it may be rather difficult to verify as a lot of different abstract notions are taken into consideration. That is why, one would make no mistake while pointing out that the claims that are presented by Aristotle are also may be regarded as speculations. Part Three: Argument Evaluation It is quite understandable that it is safe to accept the premises which are expressed by Plato regarding the impossibility of transplanting a soul with the help of a brain as the argument that he makes features sound logic. Of course, some might question several aspects of it such as What if the soul decided to choose a different body by itself? However, if a person accepts this kind of thinking, it would lead to a logical conclusion that soul is connected to one body only. The assumptions of this point of view are based primarily on dichotomy of soul and body, claiming that the former is more superior. The soundness of the claims is beyond any doubt as it does not feature blunt logical fallacies that might distort the initial premises. That is why the validity of the argument is self evident. Speaking of the thinking which is presented by Aristotle, it is also safe to accept it as it leads to logical consequences and is able to provide a satisfactory answer to the question. However, there are several questionable assumptions such as to what extend the body is able to have influence on the soul. The logical conclusion of this point of view is that soul is a secondary attribute of a body which may be transferred to a different body. Thus, the primary assumption of the Aristotle’s position is that body is superior to soul in different aspects, especially when it comes to existence. The soundness of the claims is evident since Aristotle backs up his position with formal logic. That is the reason one can easily accept the validity of his considerations and become a proponent of soul transplantation, so to speak. Part Four: Conclusion Keeping in mind the two positions which were articulated about, it would be rather advantageous to present my own argument regarding the situation. Thus, I would have to agree with Plato in that the nature of soul is deeply rooted in the non material world and one can not affect it, moreover transplant, while working with the material objects. The major assumption that I advocate is that in spite of the fact that the operation might be successful it is not able to transfer the conscience even though it will transplant the part of brain which is though to be responsible for it. Similar to Plato, I will not be able to refer to any factual evidence except for the fact that by now there has not been such an operation which was successful. That is why point of view is more a speculative one, but it is safe to accept as I analyzed it and got rid of possible logical errors in it. Speaking of questionable assumptions in it, one might point out that the exact mechanism of the relationship between soul and body is still not fully examined. However, the logical conclusion that my position is likely to lead to is that no matter how hard the doctors will try, they still will not be able to transplant a soul in a different body. The primary assumption for my position is that brain as well as soul are two completely different matters. The soundness of the claims is seen in the fact that it is may be supported by the work of famous philosophers. Finally, the validity of my position is seen in that it is able to explain the failure of the above mentioned operation with the help of formal logic and easy to understand notions which can be verified by extra research. Works Cited Elkaisy-Friemuth, Maha, and John M. Dillon. The Afterlife of the Platonic Soul: Reflections of Platonic Psychology in the Monotheistic Religions. Leiden: Brill, 2009. Print. Johansen, T. K. The Powers of Aristotles Soul. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford UP, 2012. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Who are you Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Who are you Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1663364-who-are-you
(Who Are You Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Who Are You Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1663364-who-are-you.
“Who Are You Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1663364-who-are-you.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Who Are You: Plato and Aristotel

Soul and Justice in the works of Plato, Aristotle and Epicurus

This paper is being carried out to compare and contrast the definitions of soul and justice in the works of plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus.... This essay discusses that plato (428-347 BC) defined the soul's parts as appetite, spirit, and reason.... Justice to plato meant harmony with each fulfilling his role.... plato's ideal city was meant as a model for an individual to set up the government of their soul.... Aristotle (384-322 BC), a student of plato, presents his theory of the soul in “De Anima”....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Good Life: Views of Plato and Aristotle

The essay "The Good Life: Views of plato and Aristotle" focuses on the critical analysis of what the good life is, as viewed by plato and Aristotle, who have largely different views about what the good life is and how it can be obtained, whether despite or because Plato was Aristotle's teacher.... key insight into Plato's view comes along towards the end of The Allegory of the Cave when he pronounces 'they who are truly rich, not in silver and gold, but in virtue and wisdom, which are the true blessings of life' (10), showing that to have it good, one must have virtue and wisdom, before any form of monetary wealth, to be considered to have a high quality of life....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Plato and Aristotle on the Just Man and the Good Citizen

Aristotle, student of plato, in his book “Politics”, criticizes and contradicts plato's views and provides a more liberal and realistic framework.... This paper compares and contrasts plato's and Aristotle's views on the relationship between moral/philosophic virtue and the capacity for being a good citizen. ... ccording to plato, a just man will be like a just city from the view point of justice.... Both, a just city and a In fact, these very virtues make a city or an individual just - “Then a just man won't differ at all from a just city in respect to the form b of justice;” (plato, 110) This discussion starts from the state level and eventually moves down to the level of an individual but plato makes it absolutely clear that the presence of the above mentioned virtues in an individual citizen leads to a state, which has these same virtues....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Plato and Aristotle in Robert Pirsigs Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

From the paper "plato and Aristotle in Robert Pirsigs Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" it is clear that both plato and Aristotle in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance are praised for one of the most important features of contemporary Western civilization, the analytical thinking.... The main character called 'Phaedrus' (a significant name from one of Plato's dialogues) meets plato and Aristotle to get fascinated with the former, attack the latter, and then come to the deeper, non-evaluative understanding of both....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Regard Plato's view of the ideal from his Allegory of the Cave

“the man who is sharpest at making out the things that go by, and most remembers, which of them are accustomed to pass before, which after, and which at the same time as others, and who is thereby most able to divine what is going to come, in your opinion would he be desirous of them and envy those who are honored and hold power among these men?... plato warns about the threat to become prisoners of our own minds.... plato warns about the threat to become prisoners of our own minds....
2 Pages (500 words) Admission/Application Essay

Who would you rather study with. Aristotle or Plato

hile both plato and Aristotle contributed hugely to political philosophy and shared some sentiments on the ideal state, Aristotle still had some of his reservations on some of Plato's philosophical teachings.... plato's greatest influence came from Socrates, who is.... plato would then pass his knowledge to his long term pupil Aristotle.... plato believed that the real world only acts as a mere reflection of the truth.... Thus, whereas Aristotle's philosophical values are heavily influenced by plato, there exist huge differences in their way of thinking....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Aristotelian Theory of Human Nature

s a follower and pupil of plato, his approach was Platonism – which switched to empiricism after plato's death.... Some comprehended this as implying that when you take a gander at a green field, your spirit actually turns green.... Without profound knowledge of it, true happiness is hardly possible....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Ancient Medieval Thinkers - Comprehensive Philosophy Knowledge Required

Socrates argues that a perfect state is ruled by the people who are best in war and philosophy (Ryan, para 1).... plato has defined philosophers as lovers of wisdom.... According to plato, only philosophers can be the best rulers (The Philosopher King 153) as they can eliminate all evils from society.... plato's claim has no practical applicability.... plato's views are anti-democratic and curtail the choices and opportunities of the citizens....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us