StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality" it is clear that as the examples of the French Resistance and the IRA illustrate, “terrorist” campaigns are indeed often successful. There are a number of conditions for this success, however…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality"

Has terrorism ever succeeded in changing political reality? The origins of the word “terrorist” are rather ironic. It seem as though it stems from the French Revolution, when the bloody group of individuals who were members of the Jacobin Club coined the word “terrorist” to describe the kind of person needed for the Reign Of Terror. The violence was seen as an unfortunate but necessary evil that needed to be used to advance a greater political good. It is unlikely that many modern terrorists would describe their own actions any differently. To call someone a terrorist, or as often occurred with the Jacobins, to call oneself a terrorist was a mark of honor. To those subjected to that terror under the blade of the guillotine or through other, slower methods of torture, that was a rather dubious honor. The paradox remains today in any attempt to discover whether or not terrorism has achieved its political ends. Webster’s dictionary defines “terrorism” as “the use of terror and intimidation to gain one’s political objectives” (Websters, 1995). This is a fairly rational and non-judgmental definition of the word, and perhaps because of the objectivity of the statement, virtually every country in the world could be said to have used “terrorism” as a tactic many times. Every war uses terrorism on a massive scale according to this definition. Those people that are defined as “terrorists” today just happen to be rather ineffective in their killing methods (compared to sovereign countries) and have a purer political ideology than most of them. Al Quaeda killed around 3000 people on 9/11/2001, the Madrid bombers killed 192 people on 3/11/2004 and the London bombers killed 52 on 7/7/2005 (White, 2005). These figures would have been laughably small for any of the countries that deliberately bombed one another’s civilian populations in WWII. The German, American, Japanese and British authorities would have had severe questions for any bombing mission that came back with these paltry numbers. By way of comparison, more than the total 9/11 deaths die every month on American roads. So neither the method of killing, nor the numbers seem to suggest that “terrorist” is an easily definable word. This situation is complicated by the fact that all terrorist crimes would be crimes whether one precedes the word with terrorist or not. Killing another human being without justification is a criminal offence in Britain (Homicide Act, 1977), and so is attempting to kill them or to cause injury to them. The question that needs to be asked when dealing with legislating against terrorism is whether any new laws are really required. Should terrorists be prosecuted as common criminals? This question will be dealt with in detail later. It seems as though the words “terrorist” and “terrorism” are not objective descriptions of a person or a series of activities, but rather as a pejorative word used by one side of a conflict against another. Take for example the French Resistance during World War II. Was it a terrorist organization? According to the Nazi government of the country (which had won the country through the ‘legitimate’ use of military force) they were. According to much of the rest of the world, and probably 99% of today’s historians, they were not. The question is, why? The French Resistance blew up bridges, soldiers drinking in bars, executed “collaborators” summarily, assassinated leading military figures and generally conducted themselves as a terrorist group would today. They did not wear uniforms, performed “asymmetrical warfare” because they did not stand a chance taking on Germany conventionally and, to use the parlance so often adopted by governments today “hid behind civilians” in a rather cowardly way. The reason that the French Resistance is not defined as a terrorist group is that its aims are now seen as utterly legitimate. They are the positive side of the equation within the now old truism that “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” The Resistance were freedom fighters, with all the romantic and positive connotations that go along with them. The word “terrorism” thus has an indelibly moral and ethical tinge to it. The terrorists kill people “for the wrong reasons” and it is the falsity or “evil” of those reasons that make the killings so terrible, not the actual deaths. Yet as they used all the tactics of terrorists today, the French Resistance can be regarded as one terrorist campaign that clearly did achieve its objectives. They severely hampered German operations during the time of their Occupation, and played a vital role in various military operations in the run up to D-Day, on the days itself and in the aftermath (Sageman, 2004). Another case of a terrorist campaign that appears to have succeeded at least in part was that waged by the Irish Republican Army for three decades after 1969. In 1969 the Provisional IRA (which had split from the Official IRA because of ideological differences) embarked on a new campaign of violence. Over the next 28 years over 1,700 people were killed. Under the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act of 1973, “the government had available those very powers of preventive detention, summary arrest and search without warrant with which it was subsequently empowered by the Prevention of Terrorism Act.” (Lal, 1994). With the EPA designed for Northern Ireland and the PTA designed for mainland Britain, the British government had a full gamut of legislative powers with which to tackle terrorism. But the increased sophistication and planning of the IRA, with many deadly attacks upon British soldiers, RUC men and even coming within a hair’s breadth of successfully assassinating Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, seems to suggest that this was a campaign that succeeded in bringing terror into the most British minds. Yet by the mid-1980’s, Gerry Adams (the leader of the political wing of the IRA called Sinn Fein) stated that IRA tactics soon moved from all out war (which was not working) to “violent propaganda”, and subsequently to a realization that any violence was counter-productive. The question of how and why the IRA suddenly decided to give up the armed struggle, together with the degree to which this presents a hopeful situation for the final settlement of the “Irish question” has been explored by a number of scholars. Fiona (2000) et al. have suggested that there are indeed good reasons to hope that the violence has ended permanently. The fact that the IRA chose to stop the armed conflict at a time when it was not under particular military pressure to do so suggests, according to these scholars, a genuine change in attitude, at least on the part of the Provisionals. Fiona adds a note of caution through mentioning the fact that the more extreme elements of the IRA have joined splinter groups such as the “Real IRA”, who disavow any end to violence. It seems that in an ideal world most Protestants are Unionists who would want to be a full part of Britain, and in a similar perfect condition, most Catholics are Nationalists who would want to be part of a fully unified Ireland. However, as the vote on the Good Friday Accord shows, a great majority of both sides prefer a peaceful compromise to a war of absolutes. Such a spirit of complex compromise, in which the society becomes increasingly diverse with immigrants from places that do not divide themselves between two implacable causes is likely to increase in the years ahead. IRA bombings, UDF killings and the general spirit of despair that existed for so long are now just part of a history book. The next generation will grow up within a situation in which violence is not an everyday part of life. Yet the reason that their parents’ generation was prepared to come to compromise was the unremitting violence that the IRA indulged in. The IRA had won, and thus no longer needed to carry on killing and fighting. The fact that Ireland is now largely unified, with little direct control from London, illustrates that their long campaign, which for so long the English claimed would never change policy, in fact did just that. A fully unified Ireland may exist within the lifetimes of babies being born now. To conclude, as the examples of the French Resistance and the IRA illustrate, “terrorist” campaigns are indeed often successful. There are a number of conditions for this success however. First, the group must have the support of at least a sizable minority, if not majority of the population. This is the only way they can work against much stronger military forces. Second, they must have a rational and thus feasible political goal in mind. For the Resistance it was the liberation of France, for the IRA it was the unification of Ireland. Both these ends were realistic and logical in an historical sense. Third, the group against which the terrorists are fighting (whether it be occupying country, imperial power etc.) must not lose very much through giving in to the terrorist demands. This was the case with the IRA, but the case with the French Resistance, who essentially metamorphosed into part of a traditional army with the invasion of Europe on D-Day. It must also be remembered that all armed conflict is in fact a type of “terror” – the fact that nation states choose not to call it such does not make it any less so. ___________________________________________ Works Cited Fiona, Stephen. Et al (eds). A Farewell to Arms?: From ‘Long War’ to Long Peace in Northern Ireland. Manchester UP, Manchester: 2000 Kelley, Kevin. The Longest War. Zed Books, London: 1990. Lal , Vinay. “Normalization of Anti-terrorist legislation in Democracies: Comparative Notes on India, Northern Ireland and Sri Lanka”. Lokoaya Bulletin 11, no. 1, July-August 1994, 5-24. Sageman, Marc. Understanding Terror Networks. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia: 2004. The Homicide Act, 1977. Websters Dictionary Penguin, London,:1995. White, Jonathan. Terrorism and Homeland Security. Wadsworth, New York: 2005. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Has terrorism ever succeeded in changing political reality Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1540317-has-terrorism-ever-succeeded-in-changing-political-reality
(Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1540317-has-terrorism-ever-succeeded-in-changing-political-reality.
“Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1540317-has-terrorism-ever-succeeded-in-changing-political-reality.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Has Terrorism Ever Succeeded in Changing Political Reality

Abortion Clinic Attacks

Terrorism has no exact or accepted definition but it has several characteristics that differentiate it from other forms of violence, it is planned and calculated, intrinsically violent (Hoffman, 2006), has political dimensions (Richardson, 2007), and is designed to have a prolonged psychological effect beyond the immediate victims.... The Federal Bureau of Investigations of America defines terrorism as a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or may segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Terrorism 2002-2005, Federal Bureau of Investigation....
18 Pages (4500 words) Research Paper

Defining Terrorism and Victims of Terrorism

The paper "Defining terrorism and Victims of terrorism" reports that in a majority of EU states, counterterrorism resolutions passed by the UN's Security Council conflict with human rights protections accorded by the European Convention on Human Rights and domestic laws....
22 Pages (5500 words) Essay

The Al Qaida Transnational Terrorist Network

Catastrophic, or mass-casualty terrorism, once a theory, had now become a reality.... Instead of being welcomed home as heroes, however, the returning veterans of the Afghan campaign were watched by suspicious regimes who worried that the religious fervour of the fighters posed a political threat.... The resulting social and economic impact--some 3,000 lives lost and billions of dollars in economic damage--catapulted terrorism onto an entirely new level of strategic importance....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

How effective is terrorism legislation with regards to restraining terrorists

Quantitative researcher:argues that both the natural and social sciences strive for testable and confirmable theories that explain phenomena by showing how they are derived from theoretical assumptions; reduces social reality to variables in the same manner as physical reality; attempt to tightly control the variable in question to see how other variables are influenced.... From the dissertation, it is clear that however, terrorism is not a new phenomenon and governments have tried to counter it for centuries....
31 Pages (7750 words) Dissertation

Terrorism Waves In America

his paper makes a conclusion that , terrorism is the use of force unlawfully against a person or property with a motive of intimidating and or coercing a sovereign government, the population of civilians or such a segment guided by an objective of political as well as social gain.... This essay talks that terrorism has not had a singular universally accepted definition and thus has had to be defined in relation to the terror occurrence either in terms of international terrorism or in terms of domestic terrorism....
15 Pages (3750 words) Research Paper

The Repercussions of the Terrorist Attacks

It discusses many after effects of 9/11 at various social, political, military, and administrative levels.... At the political level, discussion pertains to using the 9/11 attacks as a political opportunity to unnecessary wage a war against Iraq without finding any concrete evidence of Iraq's relations with Al Qaeda.... The article discusses the political strategy of various stakeholder interests led by President Bush and others including such bigwigs as Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, and his future deputy Paul Wolfowitz in authenticating the war against Iraq, to be severely opposed by Richard A....
23 Pages (5750 words) Thesis

Postmodern Approach to the September 11 Attack

The paper "Postmodern Approach to the September 11 Attack" appeals to a number of books written from all sorts of jingoistic, political, and strategic points on the macabre 9/11 attack.... These books generally stress on the motives behind the attack and the consequences thereafter (like ravaging Afghanistan and Iraq with aerial bombing), some placing it in the political context of the post-Cold War era, some from the angle of Francis Fukuyama's much-debated 'new world order' after the 'end of history'....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The War on Terrorism

The terrorist nation has been constantly attempting to obtain botulinum toxin and appears to have succeeded; in 1991, the United Nations was unable to account for three times the amount of botulinum needed to kill the entire current human population by inhalation.... "The War on terrorism" paper throws light on the success of counterterrorism campaigns by America and her Allies despite multi-faceted criticism.... This essay forwards the opinion that the struggle against crushing terrorism is going to embrace success despite a lot of criticism....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us