StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups and Teams - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Decision-Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups and Teams" tells that as the workplace has become culturally diversified, managing multi-cultural groups/teams are no longer uncommon, that experts have continuously searched for ways by which to lead multi-cultural groups/teams.
 …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups and Teams
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups and Teams"

The manner by which managers view and approach their role is greatly influenced by their cultural frame of reference (cited in Sinclair & Robertson-Smith, 2008, p. 68).  

Concretely, an American and an Asian team leader, having an entirely different cultural frame of reference, would, more often than not, make very different management decisions for their teams. Following Hoftede’s (2007) five major dimensions by which to analyze differences among cultures: (1) power distance, (2) individualism as against collectivism, (3) uncertainty avoidance, (4) masculinity as against femininity, and (5) long-term orientation, the US business culture, Hofstede (1997) describes, illustrates low power distance, high individualism, low uncertainty avoidance, high masculinity, and low long-term orientation (cited in Ardichvili & Kuchinke, 2002, p. 101); whereas Asian culture, though much complex, can be characterized generally by high power distance, low individualism, high uncertainty avoidance, high masculinity, and high long-term orientation (Hofstede, 2009). Observably so, except for masculinity where both demonstrate high value, Americans and Asians are in the opposite spectrum for the other four culture dimensions. How these differences affect both the American and Asian team leaders in their management decisions for their teams working for Toyota will be analyzed focusing on staff evaluation.

An American leader may evaluate his/her staff differently from an Asian leader in four important points: (1) issues given importance, (2) meanings given to actions, (3) dealing with identified issues, and (4) informing the staff of the evaluation. Demonstrating high individualism, American leaders are more independent-minded and competitive. In evaluating their staff, they will most likely stick to performance issues based on the Toyota Production System’s standardized work. So, they will interpret the actions of their staff mainly in relation to their work execution. As such, individual initiative and the courage to take risks are given weight, which Freeman and Brown (2004) say, are consistent with low uncertainty avoidance culture (p. 175). 

Furthermore, with a low power distance culture, American leaders could present their evaluation to their staff, whether good or bad without much difficulty because they welcome dissenting opinions even from their subordinates and in fact, would even seek for it (Hofstede, 1991, p. 28). Besides, they are work-oriented. Their main concern is getting to the bottom of the matter right away because every minute counts.  Such is consistent with the high masculine culture and low long-term orientation.          

Given Toyota’s philosophy: “We do not just build cars; we build people” (Liker & Meier, 2007, p. 3), the advantages of American leaders over Asian leaders in evaluating a multi-cultural staff working in Toyota can be attributed to the American’s objectivity, open-mindedness, and competitiveness. First, being objective enables American leaders to evaluate staff mainly on the basis of their production performance. As such, issues unrelated to the Toyota Production System, which are oftentimes the source of conflict among the culturally diverse workforce and which more often than not are better left alone to the workers themselves than having managers intervene (Brett, Behfar & Kern, 2006, p. 1), will be avoided. Thus even the staff would be naturally compelled to concentrate on production matters rather than personal issues. Resultantly, the diverse workforce is then tuned in to a common goal – to excel in creating well-defined and efficient work methods. Second, the American leaders’ open-mindedness would enable them to hear opinions from the staff. This allows a dialogue that may pave the way to the team’s greater understanding of their strengths and weaknesses with regard to their overall performance. This would not only give the leader concrete bases for a better plan but more importantly, would also help the staff to better understand the work. As Toyota proudly claims, what distinguishes them best from other organizations is the “depth of understanding among Toyota employees regarding their work” (Liker & Meier, 2007, p. 112).  Third, the competitive trait of the American leaders would enable them to analyze which qualities or motivations do staff lack or need to drive them to perform best. This would allow the American leader to see cultural factors that may have bearing on the staff performance, thus enabling them to address such issues.

However, these American cultural traits may also have negative effects in evaluating the staff. Driven too much by work performance and achievement, American leaders may fail to recognize issues non-related to the Toyota Production System, but the key to the performance of non-American staff.  For example, the ‘sempai-kohai’ mentor relationship in Japan allows a personal bond between Japanese managers and employees (Chang, et al., 2001, p. 2). Thus, evaluating a Japanese staff based on standardized work alone would be insufficient. Second, the tendency of the American leader to evaluate staff based on individual performance may fail to see the impact of team related to the staff performance. As such, this may weaken American leaders’ decisions in terms of long-term philosophy, which is one of Toyota’s fourteen principles (Liker & Meier, 2007, p. 6).  Third, in presenting the evaluation, not taking into consideration the feelings of the staff, specifically for Asians, may build walls rather than understanding between the leader and them, forfeiting the very aim of the evaluation.        

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups/Teams Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1430049-decision-making-for-leading-multi-cultural-groups
(Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups/Teams Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/management/1430049-decision-making-for-leading-multi-cultural-groups.
“Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups/Teams Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1430049-decision-making-for-leading-multi-cultural-groups.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Decision Making for Leading Multi-Cultural Groups and Teams

Cross cultural awareness

tereotypes can also help in understanding the differences in a non-complex manner and thus enable better decision making (Ewen and Ewen, 2006).... This report highlights some of the challenges and… This report is made for the use of the specialists, hired by Execom in the field of Marketing, HRM and Food and Beverages, and it is expected that they will be able to make use of the cultural aspects in Stereotypes are simplified and standardized conceptions about groups of people or individuals (Hurst, 2007)....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Multicultural Team Effectiveness

Increased movement of people beyond political boundaries in search for employment as well as the establishment of companies in foreign… This paper presents a critique of multicultural team effectiveness....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Scottish Development International and Scotland

Consequently, drawing from vastly experienced managers in well established international organizations, they are quick to point out four major areas posing a challenge these include communication criteria, accents and language fluency, Attitude towards authority and the hierarchical structure of the organization and decision making norms in the organization....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

How Does Organisational Structure Affect Leadership Skills

Difficult situations faced by the teams can be solved with the… Such strategies are increasing the compatibility among the teams and multidepartment organisation.... However, ego and arrogance of leaders or managers will create complicacy in leading their peoples in multiple departments of the organisation.... Leaders are able to deal with the making decisions and implementing those in organisations is the responsibility of the managers and leaders....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Advantages of Cultural Diversity

The management of multicultural groups which are becoming more and more common is a subject of much relevance.... This becomes of increased importance with regard to both the complexities and the scope associated with the culturally diverse groups.... Six wide topics have been covered in the paper including “Multicultural working groups”, “The advantages of cultural diversity”, “Understanding Cultures”, “The cultural competencies in a multicultural team”, “Preparing the staff to work efficiently in a multicultural environment” and “The tools for managing cultural diversity....
18 Pages (4500 words) Case Study

Tips for Leading Multicultural Team

The paper “Tips for leading multi-cultural Team” undertakes a critical analysis of how leaders train employees to deal with multicultural teams to enhance productivity.... nbsp;Managing multicultural teams effectively is to identify the principal cultural causes of conflict, to ensure that both the teams work together and empower its members to deal with future challenges.... Globalization and Technology have created a work culture that makes necessary for the member of the teams to depend on one another to achieve their mission successfully....
21 Pages (5250 words) Coursework

Cross-Cultural Management Department of HR

From the paper "Cross-Cultural Management Department of HR" it is clear that structural intervention is suggested in managing multi-cultural teams.... This is particularly important for reducing interpersonal conflicts and frictions between team members.... hellip; The global HR programs must necessarily be focussed around the training programs in the subsidiary organizations across nations....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

The Importance of Cultural Differences in the Society and Its Impact on Every Field of the Society

This paper describes the importance of cultural differences in the society and its impact on each and every field of the society from day to day tasks to operational decisions, from achieving and focusing on the short-term goals to the long-term commitments.... hellip; In a country like the United States, there is a huge variety of cultural dimensions and they are often ignored especially when the concept of personal growth is taken into account....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us