StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Crime and Criminology: Beccaarias Theoretical Work - Essay Example

Summary
"Crime and Criminology: Beccaaria’s Theoretical Work" paper focuses on Marquis of Beccaria-Bonesana, an Italian philosopher and politician who wrote in the mid-sixteenth century, and examines contrasting criminological theories based on biological positivism and sociological positivism.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Crime and Criminology: Beccaarias Theoretical Work"

Crime and Criminology Crime and Criminology Task One. Beccaaria’s Theoretical Work. Cesare, Marquis of Beccaaria-Bonesana was an Italian philosopher and politician and he wrote in the mid sixteenth century. His writings were influenced by the economic disorder and the political chaos that was being experienced in the region. His most famous treatise is that of ‘On Crimes and Punishments’, which he wrote in 1764. It dealt with the theory of penology and was the first literature that had emerged against capital punishment. (Beccaaria-Bonesana, 1963) Beccaaria developed his work in the context of the historical and social conditions that prevailed in Europe at that particular moment and in Italy in particular. The age of enlightenment had dawned in Europe, and there was a growing realization of the importance of the relationship that existed between the state and the individual. There was emerging in society the liberal thought, and there was a change in the perception of the role of the state. Beccaaria was of the belief that the state had come to be with the help of the social contract, and the individual had entered into a social contract to escape the chaotic anarchical society that existed in state of nature. He advocated that the individual was a rational and reasonable being. There was thus, a shift of power that was being experienced in the social set up from a state which was ruled by a few, to one where every individual human was an integral part and had a say in the functioning of the state. There was a changing social and economic context, where there was demand being made for greater autonomy for the individual, and there was being experienced change in the economic system from that of a feudal set up to that of a mercantile nature. (Keel, 2009) The changes in the political set up were in response to these changes that were taking place in the social and economic sphere. Beccaaria wrote his work in this context, and he lay emphasis upon the importance of human understanding, rationality and autonomy and developed his theory of criminology on the basis of this belief. His theory believed that law should not be based on passion but to ensure ‘the greatest happiness shared by the greatest number’. He lays emphasis on the development of a new system of criminal justice for he believed that the system that existed was based more on passion. He advocated the development of a system which was more rational, and was against arbitrary punishments. He stated “for a punishment to attain its end, the evil which it inflicts has only to exceed the advantage derivable from the crime; in this excess of evil one should include the certainly of punishment and the loss of the good which the crime might have produced. All beyond this is superfluous and for that reason tyrannical” (Beccaaria, 1963). He was against torture and believed that it only weakened men, and he also believed that punishment should be certain and prompt as the fear of punishment, he believed would leave a ‘stronger impression’ (Beccaaria, 1963). Contrasting Criminological theory based on Biological Positivism and Sociological Positivism. There have been observed many deviants in the beliefs of the classical and the biological positivist theory. The classical theory of criminology defines crime as what the law says it is. They believed that crime was defined and determined by the legal set up operating in a country and any act which was against the law adopted by the state was an act of crime. On the other hand the positivist school of thought believed that the approach that was adopted by the classical school was unscientific. (Foxhall, 1996) They lay the emphasis of what is criminal in the human nature, and believed that any act that was universally condemned and offended the natural humane sentiments of sincerity and compassion was an act of crime. According to the classical school of thought led by Beccaaria and Bentham, all humans were rational human beings and committed crime if they did not understand the law or if it was acceptable to their rationality and ‘Hedonistic Calculus’. The positivist school on the other hand believed that human beings committed crime due to the psychological and environmental influences that they face in life. Lombroso believed that a human being is born criminal and this can be determined by his physical appearance. The classical school of thought believed that human nature is determined by the though process of the human beings, and that it is based on the mentality that is possessed by each individual. It takes into account the social context of the individual. The positivist on the other hand believed that the emphasis should be on the mind of the individual and on the physical appearance of an individual and completely ignores the influence that the external factors have on the mind. The classical school of though does not lay much emphasis on the analytical theory but believes that practicality is the solution. The positivists on the other hand lay a great deal of emphasis on the analysis of the environment of the criminal, his social and historical context. But when it came to punishment, it was opposite; the classical theory believed that a deep analysis of the situation is required while the positivist believed that quick action was called for against the arbitrator. The classical school of thought believed that society had been born out of asocial contract that had taken place between the individuals and the state, so as to end the anarchy and chaos that was experienced in the state of nature (Jupp, 1986). Thus, the individual was the source of the development of society. It was based on the fact that all individuals are equal and rational. The positivists on the other hand believed that the society was made up degenerated and advanced beings, and it was natural for the advanced to lead the society. The classical school was against torture and harsh punishment but believed that punishment should be certain and prompt and be decided and deliberated upon. It should be developed through a process of justice. The positivist believed in immediate punishment of the crime committed. So, the classical lead to a softening of the laws and there was a call for no capital punishment, while the positivist school called for immediate action, and Garofalo and later even Lombroso advocated capital punishment although Ferri believed in rehabilitation. Criminological Positivism Criminological positivism is the second school of thought that emerged in the nineteenth century in Europe. It was developed mainly by Cesare Lombroso who is an Italian criminologist and developed the Italian School of Positivist Criminology. He believed that the classical school of thought of criminology that was based on human nature was incorrect and he developed this theory which was based on certain concepts drawn from evolution, physiognomy, psychiatry. The positivist school of thought that was developed was of the basic belief that criminality was something that was hereditary, and innate from the time of birth (Crimetheory.com, Online). These are defects that are present in the physical character of a person and rejected the classical idea that crime was a state of mind. It rejected the concept that was developed by Beccaaria of rationality and ‘Hedonistic Calculus’ and in its place put in the theory that ‘Biological Determinism’ and advocated the idea that people are born criminal (Herman, 1999). He believes that a criminal can be distinguished by his physical appearance and believed that rehabilitation was the best methodology that can be adopted for dealing with criminals. There have over the years been developed many criticism against the positivist theory of criminology. Firstly, the criticism that has been levied against this is that it comes in conflict with the Darwinian principle of evolution and is contradictory to the evolution of man from ape. Another important problem that exists with the theory that is advocated with this school is that it completely overlooks the social and economic context of any action. It believes that criminology is hereditary in nature and is unable to include the social connotations that may be related to an act. The next important draw back of this is that it lays too much emphasis on the physical appearance and according to this theory children are also criminals, and therefore are open to punishment. The theory is also in complete contrast with the justice system that exist today, which advocates equality and promotes the principle of innocent until proven guilty. It believes that there should be quick justice and those who are believed guilty should be rehabilitated. This leads to the development of a rash system. It also allows for capital punishment, which is seen by some as a violation of the human rights of individuals. There is also the problem of labelling, as this system labels all the subsequent generations of a criminal as criminals as per the belief that criminology is inherent in an individual, and that one is born criminal. It also leads to the problem of social and racial inequality and promotes it. References Beccaria, Cesare, 1963. "On Crimes and Punishments." Trans. Henry Paolucci. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, pp 45-58,. Crimetheory.com (Viewed 2009), Glossary, Terms of Criminology, Positivism, Viewed, September 8 2009, at http://www.crimetheory.com/glossary.htm. Foxhall L, Lewis ADE, 1996: Greek Law in Its Political Setting: Justifications Not Justice., pp 172 Herman A 1997: The Idea of Decline in Western History, The Free Press, pp 110-113. Jupp V, 1986, Methods of Criminological Research, Routledge, pp. 154-162. Keel R, Rational choice and deterrence theory accessed on Wednesday, Viewed September 8 2009 at http://www.umsl.edu/~rkeel/200/ratchoc.html. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Crime and Criminology: Beccaarias Theoretical Work

The Criminal Justice System

In other terms, theoretical criminology encompasses the various theories, crimes, and the narratives related to or explaining crime and delinquency.... In other terms, theoretical criminology encompasses the various theories, crimes, and the narratives related to or explaining crime and delinquency (Beccaria & Davies, 1974).... This paper explores the evolution of criminological theories and the impact of criminal and delinquent theoretical research on the criminal justice system....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Evolution of Criminological Theory

n addition, the punishment was designed for the purpose of deterring crime and it was more painful than the pleasure one got from engaging in any criminal activity.... n addition, the punishments meted out on convicts were harsh and as a result, scholars began to study criminology in order to ensure that punishments were fair (DeMelo, 2001).... Theories, which depict the causation of crime, are complex but studies from the past and present help the researcher in understanding the behaviors among criminals....
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Cesare Beccaria & Classical Theories of Crime and Punishment

According to research findings of the paper 'Cesare Beccaria & Classical Theories of crime and Punishment', Beccaria's classical theories argued that people are free to decide on how to act, and human beings are hedonists, who look for pleasure while avoiding pain and the weight of benefits.... crime and punishment classical theories are based on the philosophy of utilitarianism.... His work called for conformational rational principles in criminal justice....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Classical and Positivist Views on Crime

he writings of Beccaria dwelt on the form of punishment befitting the crime and not any harsher.... [ch5, p92]1Positivist Criminology Beccaria's work changed the way the system of justice functioned and introduced punitive measures of the exemplary kind.... Positivist criminology, unlike its classical counterpart, was more environmental and less biological in its outlook and approach to the study, observation and application of the causes and effect of justice and crime....
4 Pages (1000 words) Book Report/Review

Are Criminals Born or Made

The environmental approach deals with the circumstances that made an individual to commit a crime and it does not consider the hereditary or family background of the criminal.... Therefore, the statement "Are criminals born, or made" can be considered asWhen reference is made to the science of criminology automatically, reference is made to different branches of science such as psychology, genetics, sociology etc.... The main purpose of criminology is to deal with crimes and criminals and solve this social problem....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Cesare Beccaria and Cesare Lombroso, and Their Competing Ideologies

This lead to Cesare Lombroso's quest for the people who had been born criminals as well as the representing of associations between crime and a variety of pointers of ethical-moral deficiency.... He fits into the classical school of thought and wrote his work during an era when torture was utilized in obtaining information from people and capital punishment was used for any kind of offence.... The paper "Cesare Beccaria and Cesare Lombroso, and Their Competing Ideologies" highlights that Cesare Becarria developed the classicist theory of criminology, which was supported by Jeremy Bentham, in the eighteenth century in the course of the enlightenment era....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Theoretical Criminological Explanation of Teen Shooting

This case study " theoretical Criminological Explanation of Teen Shooting" discusses a culture of gun that was recently substantiated when a 17 old teen was recently charged in the crime of shooting a young 11 old boy, Rhys Jones.... Packer has proposed two major criminal justice paradigms – the due process model and the crime control model.... The 'proponents of both models [due process and crime control] embrace constitutional values'(Packer, 1968:12), but in the case of the teen who committed the crime, the due process model appears to be applicable, because its focus is upon individual privacy rather than severe punishment of the crime....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Critical Criminology

This, therefore, shows the inherent quality of crime and which is the basis of criminology, which is legal frameworks and jurisprudences at a particular time within a specific social set-up (Arrigo, 2010).... This is the basis of critical criminology where its main approach in the matter is through analyzing the predefined structures in defining crime and human rights violations.... Among other theoretical frameworks that have been pointed out to have had an influence on the discipline are conflict theories, feminist theories as well as the postmodern theories....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us