StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil trials - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Name Institution Course Lecturer Date Civil and criminal trails Civil procedure is a body of law that sets out the standards and rules that courts follow when adjusting civil lawsuits. Furthermore, rules govern how a case or lawsuit may be commenced, the kind of service process required, motions , statement of case, orders allowed in civil cases, the conduct of trails, the timing and manner of depositions, judgment process, types of pleading and finally how the courts and clerks must function…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil trials
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil trials"

Download file to see previous pages

Each municipalities, federal government and state have their own criminal codes defining types of conduct that constitute crimes. In Scotland, law is divided into two main categories, that is, civil law and criminal law. Civil law speaks about the rights and obligations of organisations and individuals. It is a principle that was adopted from Roman law. Civil Law aims to sort out problems and arguments between individuals and other organisations. Criminal Law is the primary means by which the government discovers and criminalizes behaviour that is regarded wrong and damaging to a person s or society as a whole.

Criminal law system is the mechanism through which action is taken to deal with people suspected of committing offences. Scots civil procedure governs the rules of civil procedure in Scotland. Furthermore, it deals with the Scottish civil courts jurisdiction as follows Sheriff Courts and Court of Session. Moreover, civil procedure is generally regulated by Acts of Sederunt which are statutes which are passed by the court session (Susan MacKessack). It can also be regulated by the primary legist ration enacted such as Civil Evidence (Scotland) Act 1988 which removed requirements for corroborating evidence.

The Human right Act 1998, enacted civil procedure has increasingly been shaped by case law from the European court of Human Rights. The procedures involved in Criminal and Civil are different in many ways. In Criminal trials prosecutions of nearly all cases is started by the state while civil trials on the other hand, are started by an individual, organization or companies for their own benefits. In other words criminal trials are filed by the government while as civil trials are filed by private parties.

The trials of Criminal and Civil are normally held in different courts, and in civil trials juries are not so often used. Another distinction is that in the Criminal trials courts may force the guilty party to pay a fine as punishment for their crime and also the legal costs of the both lawyers. On the other hand, in civil trials the victim just asks for compensation and not a criminal action is taken (June Fraser). In a civil proceeding the defendant can be found not liable or liable and the judge decides on the case while in a criminal trial the defendant is sentenced if he is guilty or acquitted if not guilty by the jury this is because arguments among people can be resolved and damage mended compared to crimes in criminals cases such as murder or man slaughter which are severe and leave damages that are irreversible.

Furthermore, in civil trail procedure accuser must produce evidence beyond the proportion of probabilities while in a criminal trial the evidence produced must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Moreover, in civil trials burden of proof is on the claimant, otherwise, the charge may turn to the defendant in situations that the things speak for it. In the criminal trial the accused is considered innocent until proven guilty by the prosecutor. Compensation in term of money for injuries, an injunction or damages is usually instilled on a party found to be on the wrong in a civil trial while in criminal trials a guilty party

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1496794-discuss-the-main-procedural-differences-between
(Discuss the Main Procedural Differences Between Criminal and Civil Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1496794-discuss-the-main-procedural-differences-between.
“Discuss the Main Procedural Differences Between Criminal and Civil Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1496794-discuss-the-main-procedural-differences-between.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil trials

The Principal Rules of Evidence in Criminal and Civil Trials and Their Legal Basis

The paper "The Principal Rules of Evidence in criminal and civil trials and Their Legal Basis" discusses that there have been massive influences of recent legislation upon the basic principles of Evidence law particularly in the area of human rights and allegations of improperly adduced evidence.... The presumption of innocence in criminal law denotes that, the prosecution will have to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt.... owever, where the defence bears the legal burden in relation to a fact in issue in a criminal trial the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The origins of the US Constitution

ifth Amendment: forbids trial for a major crime except after indictment by a grand jury; prohibits repeated trials for the same offense after an acquittal (except in certain very limited... Those amendments were adopted between 1789 and 1791, and all relate to limiting the power of the federal government.... Those amendments were adopted between 1789 and 1791, and all relate to limiting the power of the federal government.... In September 1786, commissioners from five states met in the Annapolis Convention to discuss adjustments to the Articles of Confederation that would improve commerce....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Different Types of Jurisdictions

Similarly, they have jurisdictions over civil cases that involve state law issues between different states having great damages (Garvin, 2002).... procedural justice and jurisdictions.... Garvin (2002) defines Jurisdiction as the authority of a federal court or a state to hear a case....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Abolish the Death Penalty

This paper It shall discuss the different legal and academic papers which support this position and shall focus on the following issues surrounding the imposition of capital punishment: whether or not its administration is affected by race and whether or not it actually deters the commission of crimes.... In a paper by Loury (2001) he assessed the trend in the felony division jury trials in Cook County Circuit Court between January 1 and June 30,...
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Comparison between Criminal and Civil Law

Although both criminal and civil cases involve an argument concerning the rights and responsibilities of the people involved in a case, there are still a lot of difference between criminal law and civil law in terms of principles, In this study, the difference between the civil and criminal court principles, administration, procedures and types of cases in Ontario will be compared and contrast.... As part of going through the main discussion, examples of cases that occurred in Ontario since 2005 will be provided in this paper....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Separation or Division of Powers between Institutions in the Criminal Justice System

The magistrate court deals with trials of most criminal offense.... County Court deals with the trial of most civil Cases.... Before comparing the criminal Justice of countries like United Kingdom, South Africa, and France, there is need first to understand what criminal justice system entails and some of its components.... criminal justice system1 entails processes put in place by the government of a… How the criminal justice system works in a given region depends on the jurisdiction in charge: county, city, federal, state, or military installation....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

To What Extent Was the Trial of Saddam Hussein a Show Trial

However, Saddam could still be tried under the rules of International criminal Court in The Hague for crimes against humanity in his own country.... The author states that the trial raised many issues with some viewing it as a mere show with a predetermined conclusion in which Saddam would inevitably be executed....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates Court and Southwark Crown Court

The paper "Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates' Court and Southwark Crown Court" compares the differences between these two courts and evaluates the administration of justice within both courts.... To begin with, Magistrates' Courts are the lower tier of the criminal court system....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us